| Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 2: P Łużecki | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | *-G Superson,P Anastaziak-Z Stawski | 4 | NS | 3  | E |  A | -3 | +300 | 69.12% | 69.12% | ||
| *-P Anastaziak,Z Stawski-G Superson | 5 | NS | 4  | E |  10 | +1 | -450 | 32.35% | 50.74% | |||
| *-Z Stawski,G Superson-P Anastaziak | 6 | NS | 3  | S |  Q | -1 | -50 | 23.53% | 41.67% | |||
| 2 | *-R Jarmużewski,S Polak-W Uszynski | 7 | NS | 4  | N |  4 | -1 | -100 | 38.24% | 40.81% | ||
| *-S Polak,W Uszynski-R Jarmużewski | 8 | NS | 4  | N |  9 | -3 | -150 | 82.35% | 49.12% | |||
| *-W Uszynski,R Jarmużewski-S Polak | 9 | NS | 3  | E |  K | +1 | -130 | 77.94% | 53.92% | |||
| 3 | *-T Garbacik,S Czech-M Tomczewska | 10 | NS | 4  | W |  9 | +2 | -680 | 89.71% | 59.03% | ||
| *-S Czech,M Tomczewska-T Garbacik | 11 | NS | 3  | N |  K | = | +400 | 83.82% | 62.13% | |||
| *-M Tomczewska,T Garbacik-S Czech | 12 | NS | 4  | S |  8 | -4 | -400 | 0.00% | 55.23% | |||
| 4 | *-I Jagielski,S Cieślak-M Sosiński | 13 | NS | 1  × | S |  3 | -1 | -200 | 30.88% | 52.79% | ||
| *-S Cieślak,M Sosiński-I Jagielski | 14 | NS | 2  | W |  5 | +1 | -140 | 26.47% | 50.40% | |||
| *-M Sosiński,I Jagielski-S Cieślak | 15 | NS | 1  | S |  J | +1 | +120 | 96.93% | 54.28% | |||
| 5 | *-K Sikorski,G Wodecki-W Łobacz | 1 | NS | 1  | S |  K | -2 | -100 | 48.53% | 53.84% | ||
| *-G Wodecki,W Łobacz-K Sikorski | 2 | NS | 2  | E |  J | +3 | -200 | 67.65% | 54.82% | |||
| *-W Łobacz,K Sikorski-G Wodecki | 3 | NS | 5  | E |  10 | +1 | -620 | 25.00% | 52.83% | |||
| 6 | *-A Pomarański,S Król-T Bożek | 19 | NS | 4  | E |  6 | +2 | -680 | 38.24% | 51.92% | ||
| *-S Król,T Bożek-A Pomarański | 20 | NS | 4  | W |  K | +2 | -680 | 48.53% | 51.72% | |||
| *-T Bożek,A Pomarański-S Król | 21 | NS | 3  | E |  7 | -3 | +150 | 72.06% | 52.85% | |||
| 7 | *-K Bojeczko,I Radziukevich-J Michałowski | 22 | NS | 3  | W |  K | = | -140 | 8.82% | 50.53% | ||
| *-I Radziukevich,J Michałowski-K Bojeczko | 23 | NS | 1  × | S |  6 | -2 | -500 | 2.94% | 48.16% | |||
| *-J Michałowski,K Bojeczko-I Radziukevich | 24 | NS | 3  | N |  Q | -3 | -150 | 4.41% | 46.07% | |||
| 8 | *-J Bazyluk,E Pinkiewicz-P Grabowski | 25 | NS | 6  | E |  K | -3 | +300 | 89.71% | 48.06% | ||
| *-E Pinkiewicz,P Grabowski-J Bazyluk | 26 | NS | 4  | S |  4 | +2 | +170 | 22.06% | 46.93% | |||
| *-P Grabowski,J Bazyluk-E Pinkiewicz | 27 | NS | 3  | S |  5 | +2 | +460 | 63.24% | 47.60% | |||
| 9 | *-J Pasich,W Jakowicki-P Ilczuk | 28 | NS | 3  | N |  3 | = | +600 | 32.35% | 46.99% | ||
| *-W Jakowicki,P Ilczuk-J Pasich | 29 | NS | 4  | W |  A | +1 | -650 | 19.12% | 45.92% | |||
| *-P Ilczuk,J Pasich-W Jakowicki | 30 | NS | 2  | E |  K | = | -110 | 44.12% | 45.86% | |||
| 10 | *-R Krawczyk,L Warwocki-E Kalińska | 16 | NS | 4  | E |  4 | = | -620 | 91.18% | 47.47% | ||
| *-L Warwocki,E Kalińska-R Krawczyk | 17 | NS | 2  | W |  A | +1 | -150 | 8.82% | 46.14% | |||
| *-E Kalińska,R Krawczyk-L Warwocki | 18 | NS | 4  | E |  K | = | -130 | 5.88% | 44.80% | |||
| SUMA: | 44.80% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 44.80% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 121 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.25 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-08-07 o 14:19:12