| ROUND 4, SEGMENT 2, TABLE 5 | ||||||||||||||
| LATTERIA TINIS-STEINPOL I | VS | CONNECTOR Poznań | ||||||||||||
| OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
| NS:R Sakowicz-P Miechowicz | NS:D Kazmucha-C Serek | |||||||||||||
| EW:M Puczyński-K Araszkiewicz | EW:P Tuszyński-W Sroczyński | |||||||||||||
| contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
| NS EW | NS EW | 13 | 27 | |||||||||||
4![]() | N | 10 | +1 | 650 | 13 | 4![]() | N | J | -1 | -100 | 13 | |||
5![]() | S | A | = | 400 | 14 | 5![]() | S | A | = | 400 | – | – | ||
4![]() | S | 6 | +1 | 650 | 15 | 4![]() | S | 6 | +1 | 650 | – | – | ||
5![]() | S | A | = | 400 | 16 | 3![]() | S | 8 | +3 | 170 | 6 | |||
1![]() | N | 8 | +2 | 150 | 17 | 1![]() | N | 8 | +2 | 150 | – | – | ||
3![]() | N | 2 | +1 | 170 | 18 | 4![]() | W | A | -1 | 50 | 3 | |||
3![]() | N | 2 | -2 | -100 | 19 | 4![]() | S | A | -1 | -50 | 2 | |||
2![]() | W | A | -4 | 400 | 20 | 2![]() | W | A | -3 | 300 | 3 | |||
4![]() | N | 2 | +1 | 650 | 21 | 4![]() | N | 2 | +2 | 680 | 1 | |||
3![]() | E | 6 | = | -600 | 22 | 3![]() | E | 4 | = | -600 | – | – | ||
2![]() | W | Q | = | -110 | 23 | 2![]() | W | Q | +1 | -140 | 1 | |||
5![]() | E | A | = | -400 | 24 | 5 × | W | J | -2 | 300 | 12 | |||
| Click on board number above to see it on the right. Click table number on the right to see its travellers. | IMP: | 39 | 42 | |||||||||||
| RESULT: | 9.25 | 10.75 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 | ||||||||||||||