SEGMENT 2, TABLE 2 | ||||||||||||||
RUCH AZS PWr 1 Wrocław | VS | Bridge24.pl | ||||||||||||
OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
NS:P Gawryś-M Klukowski | NS:N Bocchi-G Duboin | |||||||||||||
EW:K Buras-G Narkiewicz | EW:C Balicki-A Żmudziński | |||||||||||||
contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
NS EW | NS EW | 5 | 30.2 | |||||||||||
3 | N | 4 | -1 | -100 | 13 | 3 | S | J | = | 600 | 12 | |||
3 | N | J | = | 400 | 14 | 3 | S | 3 | = | 400 | – | – | ||
1 | W | A | = | -90 | 15 | 3 | W | 4 | -4 | 200 | 7 | |||
2 | S | 4 | = | 110 | 16 | 4 | N | A | -2 | -100 | 5 | |||
4 | W | K | -1 | 50 | 17 | 4 | W | 4 | -1 | 50 | – | – | ||
2 | N | 3 | +2 | 170 | 18 | 1 | N | 3 | +2 | 150 | 1 | |||
4 | W | 3 | -1 | 100 | 19 | 4 | E | 4 | -1 | 100 | – | – | ||
5× | N | A | -2 | -500 | 20 | 4 | E | Q | +2 | -680 | 5 | |||
3 | W | 3 | = | -400 | 21 | 3 | W | 8 | -1 | 50 | 10 | |||
5× | N | A | -2 | -300 | 22 | 6× | E | Q | = | -1540 | 15 | |||
1 | E | 2 | = | -90 | 23 | 2 | E | 6 | -1 | 100 | 5 | |||
4 | W | 10 | = | -420 | 24 | 4 | W | 10 | -2 | 100 | 11 | |||
Click on board number above to see it on the right. Click table number on the right to see its travellers. | IMP: | 31 | 75.2 | |||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 |