| ROUND 5, SEGMENT 2, TABLE 6 | ||||||||||||||
| LATTERIA TINIS-STEINPOL I | VS | Bridge24.pl | ||||||||||||
| OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
| NS:R Sakowicz-P Miechowicz | NS:G Narkiewicz-K Buras | |||||||||||||
| EW:R Jagniewski-W Gaweł | EW:P Tuszyński-M Szymanowski | |||||||||||||
| contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
| NS EW | NS EW | 14 | 6 | |||||||||||
4![]() | W | 9 | +2 | -680 | 13 | 4![]() | W | 9 | +2 | -680 | – | – | ||
2![]() | W | 2 | +1 | -140 | 14 | 3![]() | W | 3 | = | -140 | – | – | ||
| PASS | 0 | 15 | 3![]() | S | K | -2 | -200 | 5 | ||||||
4![]() | E | A | -1 | 100 | 16 | 4![]() | W | 5 | = | -620 | 12 | |||
2![]() | S | 7 | = | 90 | 17 | 2 × | S | 7 | = | 180 | 3 | |||
5 × | N | 6 | -1 | -200 | 18 | 4 × | W | 6 | -1 | 100 | 7 | |||
4![]() | W | 5 | -1 | 100 | 19 | 5![]() | E | 2 | -1 | 100 | – | – | ||
4![]() | W | 4 | = | -620 | 20 | 4![]() | W | Q | +2 | -680 | 2 | |||
3![]() | N | Q | +1 | 630 | 21 | 4![]() | S | J | +2 | 680 | 2 | |||
3![]() | N | A | = | 140 | 22 | 3![]() | S | 8 | = | 140 | – | – | ||
3![]() | S | 6 | = | 600 | 23 | 3![]() | S | 2 | -1 | -100 | 12 | |||
4![]() | W | K | -1 | 50 | 24 | 3![]() | E | 9 | -4 | 200 | 4 | |||
| Click on board number above to see it on the right. Click table number on the right to see its travellers. | IMP: | 45 | 22 | |||||||||||
| RESULT: | 14.76 | 5.24 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 | ||||||||||||||