Grand Prix Polski Par - finał, sesja 4 119: G Głasek | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | PT | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Ciechomski-*,M Ilnicki-K Dziekański | 1 | NS | 3× | W | A | = | -530 | 2.00 | 2.00 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,M Ilnicki-K Dziekański | 2 | NS | 1 | N | J | +1 | +120 | 24.00 | 26.00 | |||
2 | S Henclik-K Sikorski,J Ciechomski-* | 3 | WE | 4 | S | 5 | +2 | -490 | 8.00 | 34.00 | ||
S Henclik-K Sikorski,J Ciechomski-* | 4 | WE | 2 | W | K | +2 | +180 | 14.00 | 48.00 | |||
3 | J Ciechomski-*,I Czajka-A Sarniak | 5 | NS | 4 | S | K | -1 | -100 | 9.00 | 57.00 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,I Czajka-A Sarniak | 6 | NS | 5 | S | 2 | -1 | -50 | 10.73 | 67.73 | |||
4 | B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski,J Ciechomski-* | 7 | WE | 3× | S | Q | -1 | +200 | 1.00 | 68.73 | ||
B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski,J Ciechomski-* | 8 | WE | 4× | S | A | -1 | +100 | 20.00 | 88.73 | |||
5 | W Kurkowski-M Tekieli,J Ciechomski-* | 9 | WE | 4 | N | Q | -2 | +100 | 28.00 | 116.73 | ||
W Kurkowski-M Tekieli,J Ciechomski-* | 10 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | = | -110 | 3.00 | 119.73 | |||
6 | J Ciechomski-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 11 | NS | 4× | N | A | -2 | -300 | 18.00 | 137.73 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 12 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | +1 | +150 | 26.00 | 163.73 | |||
7 | J Ciechomski-*,E Miszewska-W Tomaszek | 13 | NS | 4 | N | Q | -1 | -100 | 2.00 | 165.73 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,E Miszewska-W Tomaszek | 14 | NS | 2 | N | A | = | +110 | 26.00 | 191.73 | |||
8 | P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki,J Ciechomski-* | 15 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | +2 | -660 | 9.00 | 200.73 | ||
P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki,J Ciechomski-* | 16 | WE | 6 | N | 5 | -2 | +100 | 30.00 | 230.73 | |||
9 | J Ciechomski-*,T Garbacik-M Makarewicz | 17 | NS | 3 | S | 10 | +1 | +130 | 5.00 | 235.73 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,T Garbacik-M Makarewicz | 18 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | +1 | -450 | 13.00 | 248.73 | |||
10 | J Ciechomski-*,M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki | 19 | NS | 3 | S | K | = | +400 | 22.00 | 270.73 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki | 20 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | -1 | -100 | 2.00 | 272.73 | |||
11 | J Ciechomski-*,M Wróbel-A Pietrzyk | 21 | NS | 4 | N | Q | = | +620 | 10.00 | 282.73 | ||
J Ciechomski-*,M Wróbel-A Pietrzyk | 22 | NS | 4 | S | 3 | = | +420 | 23.00 | 305.73 | |||
12 | M Kozdrach-J Ujma,J Ciechomski-* | 23 | WE | 4 | W | J | +2 | +680 | 28.00 | 333.73 | ||
M Kozdrach-J Ujma,J Ciechomski-* | 24 | WE | 4 | S | 7 | -1 | +50 | 30.00 | 363.73 | |||
13 | M Witek-J Figlus,J Ciechomski-* | 25 | WE | 3 | E | 3 | +1 | +630 | 14.00 | 377.73 | ||
M Witek-J Figlus,J Ciechomski-* | 26 | WE | 2 | S | A | +1 | -140 | 14.00 | 391.73 | |||
14 | A Suwik-W Burakowski,J Ciechomski-* | 27 | WE | 4 | E | 6 | +2 | +480 | 17.00 | 408.73 | ||
A Suwik-W Burakowski,J Ciechomski-* | 28 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +1 | -630 | 5.00 | 413.73 | |||
15 | M Makatrewicz-B Matras,J Ciechomski-* | 29 | WE | 3 | E | A | +2 | +150 | 13.00 | 426.73 | ||
M Makatrewicz-B Matras,J Ciechomski-* | 30 | WE | 6 | S | A | +1 | -1010 | 10.00 | 436.73 | |||
SUMA: | 436.73 | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 2290.29 | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 2727.02 | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 48 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-12-20 o 12:39:24