| Grand Prix Polski Par - finał, sesja 3 112: J Figlus | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | PT | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | M Witek-*,P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki | 1 | NS | 3 × | S | K | = | +530 | 28.00 | 28.00 | ||
| M Witek-*,P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki | 2 | NS | 5 × | E | 9 | -1 | +100 | 29.93 | 57.93 | |||
| 2 | M Witek-*,J Russyan-A Kowalski | 3 | NS | 4![]() | W | J | +2 | -680 | 8.00 | 65.93 | ||
| M Witek-*,J Russyan-A Kowalski | 4 | NS | 4![]() | N | 8 | = | +620 | 12.87 | 78.80 | |||
| 3 | M Witek-*,P Saliński-R Pałasz | 5 | NS | 5 × | W | 9 | -1 | +100 | 13.00 | 91.80 | ||
| M Witek-*,P Saliński-R Pałasz | 6 | NS | 4 × | S | 2 | = | +510 | 28.71 | 120.51 | |||
| 4 | S Henclik-K Sikorski,M Witek-* | 7 | WE | 2 × | W | Q | = | +670 | 29.00 | 149.51 | ||
| S Henclik-K Sikorski,M Witek-* | 8 | WE | 6![]() | N | 7 | +1 | -1010 | 6.00 | 155.51 | |||
| 5 | M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki,M Witek-* | 9 | WE | 5![]() | N | 10 | = | -450 | 14.00 | 169.51 | ||
| M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki,M Witek-* | 10 | WE | 3![]() | E | 2 | +2 | +660 | 27.00 | 196.51 | |||
| 6 | M Kozdrach-J Ujma,M Witek-* | 11 | WE | 4![]() | S | 7 | -1 | +50 | 9.00 | 205.51 | ||
| M Kozdrach-J Ujma,M Witek-* | 12 | WE | 3 × | E | A | -5 | -1100 | 2.00 | 207.51 | |||
| 7 | M Makatrewicz-B Matras,M Witek-* | 13 | WE | 3![]() | S | 8 | +2 | -660 | 2.00 | 209.51 | ||
| M Makatrewicz-B Matras,M Witek-* | 14 | WE | 6![]() | E | Q | -1 | -50 | 2.00 | 211.51 | |||
| 8 | M Witek-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 15 | NS | 6![]() | W | 8 | = | -990 | 15.00 | 226.51 | ||
| M Witek-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 16 | NS | 2![]() | S | 2 | +2 | +170 | 8.00 | 234.51 | |||
| 9 | T Garbacik-M Makarewicz,M Witek-* | 17 | WE | 1![]() | W | 6 | +2 | +150 | 26.00 | 260.51 | ||
| T Garbacik-M Makarewicz,M Witek-* | 18 | WE | 3![]() | W | Q | = | +140 | 16.00 | 276.51 | |||
| 10 | M Witek-*,B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski | 19 | NS | 1![]() | S | A | = | +80 | 21.00 | 297.51 | ||
| M Witek-*,B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski | 20 | NS | 2![]() | N | 8 | +1 | +140 | 16.00 | 313.51 | |||
| 11 | I Czajka-A Sarniak,M Witek-* | 21 | WE | 5![]() | W | 9 | -2 | -100 | 2.00 | 315.51 | ||
| I Czajka-A Sarniak,M Witek-* | 22 | WE | 4![]() | S | A | -1 | +50 | 25.00 | 340.51 | |||
| 12 | J Ciechomski-G Głasek,M Witek-* | 23 | WE | 3![]() | N | Q | +2 | -660 | 1.00 | 341.51 | ||
| J Ciechomski-G Głasek,M Witek-* | 24 | WE | 3![]() | W | K | +1 | +130 | 27.00 | 368.51 | |||
| 13 | M Witek-*,W Kurkowski-M Tekieli | 25 | NS | 3 × | W | 3 | -2 | +500 | 15.00 | 383.51 | ||
| M Witek-*,W Kurkowski-M Tekieli | 26 | NS | 2![]() | S | 3 | = | +110 | 13.00 | 396.51 | |||
| 14 | M Witek-*,M Ilnicki-K Dziekański | 27 | NS | 3![]() | N | 2 | = | +140 | 18.00 | 414.51 | ||
| M Witek-*,M Ilnicki-K Dziekański | 28 | NS | 2![]() | E | 4 | = | -90 | 18.00 | 432.51 | |||
| 15 | A Suwik-W Burakowski,M Witek-* | 29 | WE | 4![]() | W | 6 | -2 | -200 | 9.00 | 441.51 | ||
| A Suwik-W Burakowski,M Witek-* | 30 | WE | 2![]() | E | 4 | = | +110 | 21.00 | 462.51 | |||
| SUMA: | 462.51 | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 1755.33 | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 2217.84 | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 55 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-12-20 o 12:33:48