Grand Prix Polski Par - finał, sesja 3 10: T Garbacik | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | PT | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | I Czajka-A Sarniak,*-M Makarewicz | 1 | WE | 4 | W | Q | -2 | -100 | 10.00 | 10.00 | ||
I Czajka-A Sarniak,*-M Makarewicz | 2 | WE | 4 | E | 6 | = | +420 | 16.07 | 26.07 | |||
2 | *-M Makarewicz,A Suwik-W Burakowski | 3 | NS | 5 | W | J | +1 | -690 | 2.00 | 28.07 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,A Suwik-W Burakowski | 4 | NS | 4 | N | 7 | = | +620 | 12.87 | 40.94 | |||
3 | *-M Makarewicz,B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski | 5 | NS | 5 | N | 6 | -1 | -100 | 1.00 | 41.94 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,B Szulejewski-T Paluchowski | 6 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | -1 | -50 | 11.57 | 53.51 | |||
4 | *-M Makarewicz,M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki | 7 | NS | 2× | W | Q | = | -670 | 1.00 | 54.51 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,M Maj-Rudnicka-M Kraśnicki | 8 | NS | 3 | N | 6 | +2 | +460 | 0.00 | 54.51 | |||
5 | J Ciechomski-G Głasek,*-M Makarewicz | 9 | WE | 4 | N | 3 | = | -420 | 28.00 | 82.51 | ||
J Ciechomski-G Głasek,*-M Makarewicz | 10 | WE | 1 | W | 8 | +3 | +180 | 6.00 | 88.51 | |||
6 | J Russyan-A Kowalski,*-M Makarewicz | 11 | WE | 4 | S | 10 | -1 | +50 | 9.00 | 97.51 | ||
J Russyan-A Kowalski,*-M Makarewicz | 12 | WE | 3 | S | K | +2 | -660 | 5.00 | 102.51 | |||
7 | M Ilnicki-K Dziekański,*-M Makarewicz | 13 | WE | 4 | N | A | +1 | -650 | 16.00 | 118.51 | ||
M Ilnicki-K Dziekański,*-M Makarewicz | 14 | WE | 6 | E | J | = | +980 | 20.00 | 138.51 | |||
8 | M Makatrewicz-B Matras,*-M Makarewicz | 15 | WE | 6 | E | 6 | +1 | +1020 | 28.00 | 166.51 | ||
M Makatrewicz-B Matras,*-M Makarewicz | 16 | WE | 2 | S | A | +2 | -170 | 22.00 | 188.51 | |||
9 | *-M Makarewicz,M Witek-J Figlus | 17 | NS | 1 | W | 6 | +2 | -150 | 4.00 | 192.51 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,M Witek-J Figlus | 18 | NS | 3 | W | Q | = | -140 | 14.00 | 206.51 | |||
10 | W Kurkowski-M Tekieli,*-M Makarewicz | 19 | WE | 3× | E | 3 | +1 | +870 | 30.00 | 236.51 | ||
W Kurkowski-M Tekieli,*-M Makarewicz | 20 | WE | 2 | N | 8 | +1 | -140 | 14.00 | 250.51 | |||
11 | *-M Makarewicz,M Kozdrach-J Ujma | 21 | NS | 4 | E | 10 | -1 | +50 | 21.00 | 271.51 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,M Kozdrach-J Ujma | 22 | NS | 4× | S | A | -1 | -100 | 0.00 | 271.51 | |||
12 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-M Makarewicz | 23 | WE | 5 | S | Q | -1 | +100 | 21.00 | 292.51 | ||
T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-M Makarewicz | 24 | WE | 1 | S | A | = | -80 | 5.00 | 297.51 | |||
13 | P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki,*-M Makarewicz | 25 | WE | 4× | W | 3 | -2 | -500 | 15.00 | 312.51 | ||
P Błaszczyk-D Bogucki,*-M Makarewicz | 26 | WE | 3 | S | 8 | -1 | +100 | 29.00 | 341.51 | |||
14 | *-M Makarewicz,P Saliński-R Pałasz | 27 | NS | 2 | N | Q | +2 | +170 | 29.00 | 370.51 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,P Saliński-R Pałasz | 28 | NS | 2 | E | A | +1 | -110 | 10.00 | 380.51 | |||
15 | *-M Makarewicz,S Henclik-K Sikorski | 29 | NS | 5× | S | J | -3 | -800 | 0.00 | 380.51 | ||
*-M Makarewicz,S Henclik-K Sikorski | 30 | NS | 2 | E | 6 | +1 | -150 | 6.00 | 386.51 | |||
SUMA: | 386.51 | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 1895.96 | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 2282.47 | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 49 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-12-20 o 12:33:48