| Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 314: M Witek | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | A Riss-T Zaleski,S Cieślak-* | 10 | WE | 2![]() | N | 3 | = | -90 | 56.06% | 56.06% | ||
| A Riss-S Cieślak,*-T Zaleski | 11 | WE | 4 × | W | A | = | +510 | 95.59% | 75.82% | |||
| A Riss-*,T Zaleski-S Cieślak | 12 | NS | 4![]() | E | 2 | +1 | -450 | 36.76% | 62.80% | |||
| 2 | P Łużecki-W Łobacz,S Henclik-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | S | 3 | -5 | +500 | 99.96% | 72.09% | ||
| P Łużecki-S Henclik,*-W Łobacz | 8 | WE | 4![]() | W | 8 | -1 | -50 | 17.65% | 61.20% | |||
| P Łużecki-*,W Łobacz-S Henclik | 9 | NS | 3 × | S | 2 | +1 | +570 | 99.96% | 67.66% | |||
| 3 | J Kazmucha-A Chmielewski,J Pietrusza-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | N | 6 | -1 | +100 | 57.35% | 66.19% | ||
| J Kazmucha-J Pietrusza,*-A Chmielewski | 5 | WE | 4![]() | W | A | = | +420 | 97.06% | 70.05% | |||
| J Kazmucha-*,A Chmielewski-J Pietrusza | 6 | NS | 3![]() | W | 2 | +2 | -200 | 45.59% | 67.33% | |||
| 4 | M Tomczewska-P Kaczmarek,A Kondeja-* | 1 | WE | 3![]() | E | 5 | +2 | +460 | 86.34% | 69.23% | ||
| M Tomczewska-A Kondeja,*-P Kaczmarek | 2 | WE | 1![]() | E | J | = | +80 | 72.06% | 69.49% | |||
| M Tomczewska-*,P Kaczmarek-A Kondeja | 3 | NS | 7![]() | W | 8 | = | -2220 | 1.47% | 63.82% | |||
| 5 | K Cichy-S Pająk,T Kaczanowski-* | 13 | WE | 2![]() | E | Q | = | +110 | 51.47% | 62.87% | ||
| K Cichy-T Kaczanowski,*-S Pająk | 14 | WE | 4![]() | E | K | -1 | -50 | 17.65% | 59.64% | |||
| K Cichy-*,S Pająk-T Kaczanowski | 15 | NS | 3![]() | S | 2 | = | +140 | 47.06% | 58.80% | |||
| 6 | K Omernik-P Marcinowski,R Wajs-* | 25 | WE | 4 × | S | A | -2 | +300 | 45.59% | 57.98% | ||
| K Omernik-R Wajs,*-P Marcinowski | 26 | WE | 4![]() | W | 6 | = | +620 | 95.59% | 60.19% | |||
| K Omernik-*,P Marcinowski-R Wajs | 27 | NS | 3![]() | W | 2 | -3 | +150 | 100.00% | 62.40% | |||
| 7 | E Krawczyk-M Sady,W Jakowicki-* | 22 | WE | 3![]() | E | 6 | = | +600 | 75.74% | 63.10% | ||
| E Krawczyk-W Jakowicki,*-M Sady | 23 | WE | 3 × | N | Q | -3 | +800 | 89.71% | 64.43% | |||
| E Krawczyk-*,M Sady-W Jakowicki | 24 | NS | 2![]() | E | K | +1 | -140 | 52.94% | 63.88% | |||
| 8 | R Nowicki-M Taczewski,K Bojeczko-* | 19 | WE | 2![]() | S | 2 | = | -110 | 17.84% | 61.79% | ||
| R Nowicki-K Bojeczko,*-M Taczewski | 20 | WE | 6![]() | S | 2 | = | -1430 | 20.59% | 60.00% | |||
| R Nowicki-*,M Taczewski-K Bojeczko | 21 | NS | 2![]() | E | 2 | +1 | -110 | 72.06% | 60.50% | |||
| 9 | V Vainikonis-W Sienkiewicz,A Suchodolski-* | 16 | WE | 4![]() | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 77.94% | 61.20% | ||
| V Vainikonis-A Suchodolski,*-W Sienkiewicz | 17 | WE | 3![]() | E | 4 | +1 | +430 | 57.35% | 61.05% | |||
| V Vainikonis-*,W Sienkiewicz-A Suchodolski | 18 | NS | 3 × | W | K | +1 | -570 | 2.94% | 58.90% | |||
| 10 | K Małecka-M Kraśnicki,M Bielawski-* | 28 | WE | 4 × | E | 6 | -2 | -300 | 73.53% | 59.42% | ||
| K Małecka-M Bielawski,*-M Kraśnicki | 29 | WE | 3![]() | E | K | +2 | +660 | 82.35% | 60.21% | |||
| K Małecka-*,M Kraśnicki-M Bielawski | 30 | NS | 1![]() | S | 9 | +1 | +120 | 70.59% | 60.56% | |||
| SUMA: | 60.56% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 60.56% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 3 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-07-28 o 14:39:05