| Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 106: T Żurawski | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | R Kamiński-J Batóg,*-M Taczewski | 1 | WE | APP | 60.00% | 60.00% | ||||||
| R Kamiński-*,M Taczewski-J Batóg | 2 | NS | 2 × | E | 10 | -1 | +100 | 67.65% | 63.82% | |||
| R Kamiński-M Taczewski,J Batóg-* | 3 | WE | 6![]() | E | 5 | +1 | +1470 | 61.76% | 63.14% | |||
| 2 | A Zaleski-H Szwarc,*-P Marcinowski | 7 | WE | 3![]() | S | 3 | -2 | +200 | 65.13% | 63.64% | ||
| A Zaleski-*,P Marcinowski-H Szwarc | 8 | NS | 3![]() | W | 8 | -1 | +50 | 82.35% | 67.38% | |||
| A Zaleski-P Marcinowski,H Szwarc-* | 9 | WE | 2![]() | N | 2 | +2 | -130 | 43.94% | 63.47% | |||
| 3 | M Niesłuchowski-P Błaszczyk,*-W Sienkiewicz | 13 | WE | 1![]() | E | 2 | -2 | -200 | 2.94% | 54.83% | ||
| M Niesłuchowski-*,W Sienkiewicz-P Błaszczyk | 14 | NS | 2![]() | W | 7 | +2 | -170 | 17.65% | 50.18% | |||
| M Niesłuchowski-W Sienkiewicz,P Błaszczyk-* | 15 | WE | 2![]() | S | 6 | +2 | -170 | 32.35% | 48.20% | |||
| 4 | S Kowalczyk-O Zieliński,*-M Sady | 4 | WE | 2 × | N | A | = | -670 | 5.88% | 43.97% | ||
| S Kowalczyk-*,M Sady-O Zieliński | 5 | NS | 4![]() | W | K | -1 | +50 | 86.76% | 47.86% | |||
| S Kowalczyk-M Sady,O Zieliński-* | 6 | WE | 3![]() | S | K | -2 | +100 | 7.35% | 44.48% | |||
| 5 | F Trojański-P Kurzak,*-M Kraśnicki | 10 | WE | 4![]() | N | 7 | -1 | +100 | 72.71% | 46.65% | ||
| F Trojański-*,M Kraśnicki-P Kurzak | 11 | NS | 3![]() | W | A | +3 | -170 | 16.18% | 44.48% | |||
| F Trojański-M Kraśnicki,P Kurzak-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | 3 | +1 | +450 | 63.24% | 45.73% | |||
| 6 | *-P Małecki,S Henclik-K Wielechowski | 16 | NS | 2![]() | N | 4 | +1 | +140 | 47.06% | 45.81% | ||
| *-S Henclik,K Wielechowski-P Małecki | 17 | NS | 3![]() | E | 5 | = | -400 | 88.24% | 48.31% | |||
| *-K Wielechowski,P Małecki-S Henclik | 18 | NS | 2 × | N | A | -1 | -200 | 16.18% | 46.52% | |||
| 7 | *-A Sękowski,A Kondeja-L Suszka | 19 | NS | 3![]() | S | 8 | -3 | -150 | 13.00% | 44.76% | ||
| *-A Kondeja,L Suszka-A Sękowski | 20 | NS | 4![]() | S | Q | +2 | +680 | 30.88% | 44.06% | |||
| *-L Suszka,A Sękowski-A Kondeja | 21 | NS | 2![]() | W | 5 | +3 | -150 | 35.29% | 43.64% | |||
| 8 | *-E Kukliński,S Cieślak-M Bednarczyk | 22 | NS | 3![]() | W | 10 | -1 | +100 | 88.60% | 45.69% | ||
| *-S Cieślak,M Bednarczyk-E Kukliński | 23 | NS | 3 × | E | 7 | +2 | -1070 | 0.00% | 43.70% | |||
| *-M Bednarczyk,E Kukliński-S Cieślak | 24 | NS | 2![]() | W | K | +2 | -170 | 22.06% | 42.80% | |||
| 9 | *-R Krawczyk,J Pietrusza-M Dobrowolski | 25 | NS | 4 × | S | 6 | -4 | -800 | 4.41% | 41.26% | ||
| *-J Pietrusza,M Dobrowolski-R Krawczyk | 26 | NS | 4![]() | W | J | = | -620 | 4.41% | 39.85% | |||
| *-M Dobrowolski,R Krawczyk-J Pietrusza | 27 | NS | 3![]() | W | 6 | = | -400 | 36.76% | 39.73% | |||
| 10 | *-M Kliś,T Kaczanowski-T Bisping | 28 | NS | 4 × | E | 6 | -2 | +300 | 26.47% | 39.26% | ||
| *-T Kaczanowski,T Bisping-M Kliś | 29 | NS | 4![]() | E | 5 | = | -630 | 70.59% | 40.34% | |||
| *-T Bisping,M Kliś-T Kaczanowski | 30 | NS | 3![]() | W | 3 | -4 | +200 | 94.12% | 42.13% | |||
| SUMA: | 42.13% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 42.13% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 131 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-07-28 o 14:39:03