| Kongresowy Turniej Indywidualny 111: A Pomarański  | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt  | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący  | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | K Wójcik-R Wolański,*-W Baś | 1 | WE | 3![]()  | N |  2 | +3 | -490 | 5.88% | 5.88% | ||
| K Wójcik-*,W Baś-R Wolański | 2 | NS | 4![]()  | S |  6 | +1 | +650 | 85.29% | 45.59% | |||
| K Wójcik-W Baś,R Wolański-* | 3 | WE | 4![]()  | S |  Q | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 63.73% | |||
| 2 | I Jagielski-M Kliś,*-G Busse | 7 | WE | 3![]()  | N |  5 | = | -600 | 66.65% | 64.46% | ||
| I Jagielski-*,G Busse-M Kliś | 8 | NS | 4 × | S |  8 | = | +590 | 100.00% | 71.56% | |||
| I Jagielski-G Busse,M Kliś-* | 9 | WE | 3![]()  | W |  A | -2 | -200 | 1.47% | 59.88% | |||
| 3 | V Vainikonis-M Wantke,*-R Szczepanowski | 13 | WE | 3![]()  | S |  4 | -1 | +100 | 52.94% | 58.89% | ||
| V Vainikonis-*,R Szczepanowski-M Wantke | 14 | NS | 4![]()  | W |  J | -1 | +50 | 76.47% | 61.09% | |||
| V Vainikonis-R Szczepanowski,M Wantke-* | 15 | WE | 4![]()  | W |  2 | +1 | +450 | 76.47% | 62.80% | |||
| 4 | W Skubisz-K Wielechowski,*-S Chruścicki | 4 | WE | 3![]()  | N |  J | -2 | +200 | 95.59% | 66.08% | ||
| W Skubisz-*,S Chruścicki-K Wielechowski | 5 | NS | 4![]()  | W |  7 | = | -430 | 26.47% | 62.48% | |||
| W Skubisz-S Chruścicki,K Wielechowski-* | 6 | WE | 2![]()  | E |  J | +2 | +170 | 46.97% | 61.18% | |||
| 5 | W Burakowski-P Marcinowski,*-A Waleśkiewicz | 10 | WE | 3![]()  | E |  7 | = | +600 | 100.00% | 64.17% | ||
| W Burakowski-*,A Waleśkiewicz-P Marcinowski | 11 | NS | 4![]()  | N |  6 | +2 | +480 | 85.29% | 65.68% | |||
| W Burakowski-A Waleśkiewicz,P Marcinowski-* | 12 | WE | 4![]()  | S |  6 | = | -620 | 47.06% | 64.44% | |||
| 6 | M Kwiecień-M Sobczak,*-K Antas | 16 | WE | 3 × | S |  Q | -3 | +500 | 73.53% | 65.01% | ||
| M Kwiecień-*,K Antas-M Sobczak | 17 | NS | 3![]()  | E |  K | = | -140 | 29.41% | 62.91% | |||
| M Kwiecień-K Antas,M Sobczak-* | 18 | WE | 5![]()  | E |  A | -1 | -50 | 7.35% | 59.83% | |||
| 7 | J Lenkiewicz-M Kraśnicki,*-K Bojeczko | 22 | WE | 4![]()  | S |  A | -1 | +50 | 44.12% | 59.00% | ||
| J Lenkiewicz-*,K Bojeczko-M Kraśnicki | 23 | NS | 3![]()  | S |  6 | +1 | +630 | 67.65% | 59.43% | |||
| J Lenkiewicz-K Bojeczko,M Kraśnicki-* | 24 | WE | 1![]()  | W |  K | -2 | -100 | 23.53% | 57.72% | |||
| 8 | W Sawczuk-P Kazub,*-I Kravchenko | 28 | WE | 2![]()  | E |  3 | = | +90 | 61.76% | 57.91% | ||
| W Sawczuk-*,I Kravchenko-P Kazub | 29 | NS | 3![]()  | N |  3 | -4 | -400 | 3.07% | 55.52% | |||
| W Sawczuk-I Kravchenko,P Kazub-* | 30 | WE | 4![]()  | N |  5 | +1 | -450 | 41.18% | 54.92% | |||
| 9 | A Kondeja-P Pacanowski,*-A Duszyński | 19 | WE | 3![]()  | S |  K | = | -110 | 13.24% | 53.26% | ||
| A Kondeja-*,A Duszyński-P Pacanowski | 20 | NS | 5 × | W |  A | -2 | +500 | 64.71% | 53.70% | |||
| A Kondeja-A Duszyński,P Pacanowski-* | 21 | WE | 3![]()  | W |  J | -2 | -100 | 17.65% | 52.36% | |||
| 10 | Z Stawski-R Jarmużewski,*-S Janik | 25 | WE | 3![]()  | N |  4 | = | -400 | 80.28% | 53.36% | ||
| Z Stawski-*,S Janik-R Jarmużewski | 26 | NS | 4![]()  | N |  Q | -1 | -100 | 44.12% | 53.04% | |||
| Z Stawski-S Janik,R Jarmużewski-* | 27 | WE | 2![]()  | E |  3 | +1 | +140 | 100.00% | 54.60% | |||
| SUMA: | 54.60% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 54.60% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 24 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2015-07-23 o 14:30:37