| Grand Prix Polski Par - finał, faza 1 21: W Gaweł | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | *-Z Ingielewicz,S Gołębiowski-D Kowalski | 1 | NS | 4![]() | N | A | -2 | -100 | 36.36% | 36.36% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,S Gołębiowski-D Kowalski | 2 | NS | 3 × | E | J | -1 | +100 | 63.64% | 50.00% | |||
| 2 | *-Z Ingielewicz,A Dudzik-M Kliś | 3 | NS | 3![]() | W | 3 | +1 | -630 | 77.27% | 59.09% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,A Dudzik-M Kliś | 4 | NS | 2![]() | N | 10 | +1 | +140 | 63.64% | 60.23% | |||
| 3 | P Ilczuk-W Starkowski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 5 | WE | 2![]() | N | 9 | +1 | -140 | 0.00% | 48.18% | ||
| P Ilczuk-W Starkowski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 6 | WE | 4![]() | S | 5 | +2 | -480 | 45.45% | 47.73% | |||
| 4 | *-Z Ingielewicz,Ł Witkowski-G Darkiewicz-Moniuszko | 7 | NS | 3 × | E | A | = | -730 | 9.09% | 42.21% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,Ł Witkowski-G Darkiewicz-Moniuszko | 8 | NS | 3![]() | W | 6 | +3 | -490 | 0.00% | 36.93% | |||
| 5 | D Filipowicz-J Cieślak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 9 | WE | 3![]() | W | 3 | = | +140 | 18.18% | 34.85% | ||
| D Filipowicz-J Cieślak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 10 | WE | 3![]() | S | 10 | +1 | -630 | 13.64% | 32.73% | |||
| 6 | *-Z Ingielewicz,J Kalita-W Strzemecki | 11 | NS | 2![]() | N | K | = | +110 | 31.82% | 32.64% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,J Kalita-W Strzemecki | 12 | NS | 4![]() | W | J | = | -420 | 50.00% | 34.09% | |||
| 7 | *-Z Ingielewicz,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 13 | NS | 4![]() | N | Q | -1 | -100 | 36.36% | 34.27% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 14 | NS | 2![]() | S | 7 | +1 | +140 | 63.64% | 36.36% | |||
| 8 | M Miłaszewski-M Bielawski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 15 | WE | 2![]() | E | 3 | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 34.85% | ||
| M Miłaszewski-M Bielawski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 16 | WE | 3![]() | N | J | -1 | +50 | 36.36% | 34.94% | |||
| 9 | R Jagniewski-R Jaśkiewicz,*-Z Ingielewicz | 17 | WE | 2![]() | W | 9 | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 32.89% | ||
| R Jagniewski-R Jaśkiewicz,*-Z Ingielewicz | 18 | WE | 5![]() | W | 9 | = | +400 | 72.73% | 35.10% | |||
| 10 | *-Z Ingielewicz,J Skrzypczak-A Bocheński | 1 | NS | 4![]() | N | 6 | = | +420 | 36.36% | 35.17% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,J Skrzypczak-A Bocheński | 2 | NS | 1![]() | S | 7 | = | +90 | 72.73% | 37.05% | |||
| 11 | *-Z Ingielewicz,B Gierulski-A Błachnio | 3 | NS | 3![]() | N | K | = | +140 | 77.27% | 38.96% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,B Gierulski-A Błachnio | 4 | NS | 5 × | N | A | = | +750 | 63.64% | 40.08% | |||
| 12 | P Busse-M Krupowicz,*-Z Ingielewicz | 5 | WE | 5 × | W | Q | -3 | -500 | 100.00% | 42.69% | ||
| P Busse-M Krupowicz,*-Z Ingielewicz | 6 | WE | 4![]() | N | 6 | +1 | -150 | 45.45% | 42.80% | |||
| 13 | M Pietraszek-K Nowak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 7 | WE | 2![]() | S | 7 | +2 | -170 | 50.00% | 43.09% | ||
| M Pietraszek-K Nowak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 8 | WE | 4![]() | S | A | +1 | -450 | 9.09% | 41.78% | |||
| 14 | *-Z Ingielewicz,J Znamirowski-R Opaliński | 9 | NS | 1![]() | E | 2 | = | -90 | 27.27% | 41.25% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,J Znamirowski-R Opaliński | 10 | NS | 4![]() | S | K | -1 | -100 | 22.73% | 40.58% | |||
| 15 | P Zawada-M Nowosadzki,*-Z Ingielewicz | 11 | WE | 3![]() | E | A | -1 | -50 | 9.09% | 39.50% | ||
| P Zawada-M Nowosadzki,*-Z Ingielewicz | 12 | WE | 3 × | W | 5 | -1 | -100 | 72.73% | 40.61% | |||
| 16 | *-Z Ingielewicz,E Miszewska-A Kowalski | 13 | NS | 4![]() | S | 8 | = | +620 | 63.64% | 41.35% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,E Miszewska-A Kowalski | 14 | NS | 3![]() | E | 9 | +1 | -130 | 36.36% | 41.19% | |||
| 17 | M Klukowski-J Żmuda,*-Z Ingielewicz | 15 | WE | 3 × | N | 5 | +1 | -930 | 0.00% | 39.94% | ||
| M Klukowski-J Żmuda,*-Z Ingielewicz | 16 | WE | 5 × | S | 10 | = | -550 | 9.09% | 39.04% | |||
| 18 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-Z Ingielewicz | 17 | WE | 1![]() | S | 2 | +1 | -120 | 22.73% | 38.57% | ||
| T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-Z Ingielewicz | 18 | WE | 2![]() | W | A | +1 | +110 | 68.18% | 39.39% | |||
| 19 | P Janiszewski-M Kwiecień,*-Z Ingielewicz | 19 | WE | 4![]() | N | 5 | = | -130 | 40.91% | 39.43% | ||
| P Janiszewski-M Kwiecień,*-Z Ingielewicz | 20 | WE | 3![]() | E | 5 | -1 | -100 | 40.91% | 39.47% | |||
| 20 | A Jeleniewski-R Grzelak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 21 | WE | 5![]() | E | 5 | +1 | +420 | 50.00% | 39.74% | ||
| A Jeleniewski-R Grzelak,*-Z Ingielewicz | 22 | WE | 3![]() | W | J | = | +140 | 95.45% | 41.14% | |||
| 21 | P Walczak-W Burakowski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 23 | WE | 1![]() | S | 4 | +2 | -150 | 27.27% | 40.80% | ||
| P Walczak-W Burakowski,*-Z Ingielewicz | 24 | WE | 3![]() | N | Q | +2 | -460 | 20.23% | 40.31% | |||
| 22 | *-Z Ingielewicz,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 25 | NS | 4![]() | N | 9 | -1 | -50 | 27.27% | 40.01% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 26 | NS | 2![]() | E | 2 | -1 | +100 | 72.73% | 40.75% | |||
| 23 | *-Z Ingielewicz,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 27 | NS | 4![]() | W | 4 | -1 | +50 | 50.00% | 40.95% | ||
| *-Z Ingielewicz,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 28 | NS | 5![]() | W | A | -1 | +50 | 68.18% | 41.55% | |||
| SUMA: | 41.55% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 59.29% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 50.42% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 38 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2015-12-13 o 14:58:50