| Grand Prix Polski Par - finał, faza 1 16: P Zatorski | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | *-E Vainikonis,P Zawada-M Nowosadzki | 1 | NS | 3![]() | N | A | -1 | -50 | 72.73% | 72.73% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,P Zawada-M Nowosadzki | 2 | NS | 2![]() | E | J | -1 | +50 | 40.91% | 56.82% | |||
| 2 | *-E Vainikonis,E Miszewska-A Kowalski | 3 | NS | 3![]() | E | 9 | +3 | -690 | 27.27% | 46.97% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,E Miszewska-A Kowalski | 4 | NS | 2![]() | N | 10 | +1 | +140 | 63.64% | 51.14% | |||
| 3 | M Klukowski-J Żmuda,*-E Vainikonis | 5 | WE | 2![]() | E | 8 | -1 | -50 | 54.55% | 51.82% | ||
| M Klukowski-J Żmuda,*-E Vainikonis | 6 | WE | 4![]() | S | 9 | +1 | -450 | 90.91% | 58.33% | |||
| 4 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-E Vainikonis | 7 | WE | 3 × | E | Q | -2 | -500 | 18.18% | 52.60% | ||
| T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-E Vainikonis | 8 | WE | 3![]() | E | 6 | = | +400 | 36.36% | 50.57% | |||
| 5 | *-E Vainikonis,P Janiszewski-M Kwiecień | 9 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | = | -620 | 31.82% | 48.48% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,P Janiszewski-M Kwiecień | 10 | NS | 4![]() | S | 7 | = | +620 | 45.45% | 48.18% | |||
| 6 | *-E Vainikonis,A Jeleniewski-R Grzelak | 11 | NS | 3![]() | S | 6 | = | +140 | 68.18% | 50.00% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,A Jeleniewski-R Grzelak | 12 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | = | -420 | 50.00% | 50.00% | |||
| 7 | W Gaweł-Z Ingielewicz,*-E Vainikonis | 13 | WE | 4![]() | N | Q | -1 | +100 | 63.64% | 51.05% | ||
| W Gaweł-Z Ingielewicz,*-E Vainikonis | 14 | WE | 2![]() | S | 7 | +1 | -140 | 36.36% | 50.00% | |||
| 8 | P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-E Vainikonis | 15 | WE | 3![]() | E | 5 | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 46.67% | ||
| P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-E Vainikonis | 16 | WE | 2![]() | N | A | = | -110 | 0.00% | 43.75% | |||
| 9 | *-E Vainikonis,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 17 | NS | 2![]() | E | 3 | = | -110 | 63.64% | 44.92% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 18 | NS | 3![]() | W | 5 | +2 | -150 | 72.73% | 46.46% | |||
| 10 | S Gołębiowski-D Kowalski,*-E Vainikonis | 1 | WE | 6![]() | N | K | -1 | +50 | 77.27% | 48.09% | ||
| S Gołębiowski-D Kowalski,*-E Vainikonis | 2 | WE | 3 × | W | A | -2 | -300 | 0.00% | 45.68% | |||
| 11 | *-E Vainikonis,A Dudzik-M Kliś | 3 | NS | 2![]() | S | Q | +1 | +140 | 77.27% | 47.19% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,A Dudzik-M Kliś | 4 | NS | 6![]() | N | A | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 45.04% | |||
| 12 | P Ilczuk-W Starkowski,*-E Vainikonis | 5 | WE | 4![]() | S | A | +1 | -650 | 18.18% | 43.87% | ||
| P Ilczuk-W Starkowski,*-E Vainikonis | 6 | WE | 5![]() | S | 3 | -1 | +50 | 72.73% | 45.08% | |||
| 13 | Ł Witkowski-G Darkiewicz-Moniuszko,*-E Vainikonis | 7 | WE | 2![]() | S | 7 | +2 | -170 | 50.00% | 45.27% | ||
| Ł Witkowski-G Darkiewicz-Moniuszko,*-E Vainikonis | 8 | WE | 2![]() | N | Q | +1 | -140 | 81.82% | 46.68% | |||
| 14 | D Filipowicz-J Cieślak,*-E Vainikonis | 9 | WE | 2![]() | N | 9 | -1 | +50 | 54.55% | 46.97% | ||
| D Filipowicz-J Cieślak,*-E Vainikonis | 10 | WE | 3![]() | S | 10 | +2 | -200 | 45.45% | 46.92% | |||
| 15 | J Kalita-W Strzemecki,*-E Vainikonis | 11 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 27.27% | 46.24% | ||
| J Kalita-W Strzemecki,*-E Vainikonis | 12 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | = | -600 | 18.18% | 45.30% | |||
| 16 | P Walczak-W Burakowski,*-E Vainikonis | 13 | WE | 4![]() | S | 4 | = | -620 | 36.36% | 45.01% | ||
| P Walczak-W Burakowski,*-E Vainikonis | 14 | WE | 3![]() | E | 9 | +1 | +130 | 63.64% | 45.60% | |||
| 17 | *-E Vainikonis,M Miłaszewski-M Bielawski | 15 | NS | 5![]() | W | Q | -1 | +50 | 40.91% | 45.45% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,M Miłaszewski-M Bielawski | 16 | NS | 5 × | S | 3 | -1 | -100 | 31.82% | 45.05% | |||
| 18 | *-E Vainikonis,R Jagniewski-R Jaśkiewicz | 17 | NS | 1![]() | S | 3 | -1 | -50 | 18.18% | 44.29% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,R Jagniewski-R Jaśkiewicz | 18 | NS | 2![]() | E | 2 | -2 | +100 | 90.91% | 45.58% | |||
| 19 | *-E Vainikonis,J Skrzypczak-A Bocheński | 19 | NS | 1![]() | N | 2 | = | +90 | 36.36% | 45.33% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,J Skrzypczak-A Bocheński | 20 | NS | 3![]() | W | 6 | = | -600 | 27.27% | 44.86% | |||
| 20 | *-E Vainikonis,B Gierulski-A Błachnio | 21 | NS | 3![]() | E | 5 | = | -400 | 90.91% | 46.04% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,B Gierulski-A Błachnio | 22 | NS | 4![]() | W | K | -1 | +100 | 86.36% | 47.05% | |||
| 21 | P Busse-M Krupowicz,*-E Vainikonis | 23 | WE | 1![]() | S | 2 | +2 | -150 | 27.27% | 46.56% | ||
| P Busse-M Krupowicz,*-E Vainikonis | 24 | WE | 3![]() | N | Q | +2 | -460 | 20.23% | 45.94% | |||
| 22 | *-E Vainikonis,M Pietraszek-K Nowak | 25 | NS | 3![]() | N | 9 | -1 | -50 | 27.27% | 45.50% | ||
| *-E Vainikonis,M Pietraszek-K Nowak | 26 | NS | 2![]() | E | K | = | -110 | 18.18% | 44.88% | |||
| 23 | J Znamirowski-R Opaliński,*-E Vainikonis | 27 | WE | 3![]() | S | J | -1 | +50 | 77.27% | 45.60% | ||
| J Znamirowski-R Opaliński,*-E Vainikonis | 28 | WE | 4![]() | W | A | = | +420 | 77.27% | 46.29% | |||
| SUMA: | 46.29% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 57.81% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 52.05% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 32 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2015-12-13 o 14:58:50