| forumbridge.pl TOPi 2013 - FINAŁ 32: A Zakrzewski | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | P Siemaszko-E Kowalewski,R Pepłoński-* | 19 | WE | 3![]() | E | 7 | = | +600 | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
| P Siemaszko-R Pepłoński,*-E Kowalewski | 20 | WE | 2![]() | W | J | -1 | -100 | 16.67% | 58.33% | |||
| P Siemaszko-*,E Kowalewski-R Pepłoński | 21 | NS | 4 × | W | K | -1 | +100 | 37.50% | 51.39% | |||
| 2 | K Puczyński-W Starkowski,J Janowski-* | 22 | WE | 4![]() | N | K | -1 | +50 | 75.00% | 57.29% | ||
| K Puczyński-J Janowski,*-W Starkowski | 23 | WE | 4 × | S | J | -1 | +200 | 100.00% | 65.83% | |||
| K Puczyński-*,W Starkowski-J Janowski | 24 | NS | 4![]() | S | K | -1 | -50 | 41.67% | 61.81% | |||
| 3 | J Kalita-*,G Gardynik-A Górzyński | 1 | NS | 5![]() | N | 2 | = | +400 | 75.00% | 63.69% | ||
| J Kalita-G Gardynik,A Górzyński-* | 2 | WE | 2![]() | E | 2 | = | +120 | 87.50% | 66.67% | |||
| J Kalita-A Górzyński,*-G Gardynik | 3 | WE | 3 × | N | 2 | -2 | +300 | 62.50% | 66.20% | |||
| 4 | J Blajda-L Zakrzewski,W Olański-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | -1 | +100 | 91.67% | 68.75% | ||
| J Blajda-W Olański,*-L Zakrzewski | 5 | WE | 2 × | E | K | -1 | -100 | 4.17% | 62.88% | |||
| J Blajda-*,L Zakrzewski-W Olański | 6 | NS | 6![]() | W | A | = | -1370 | 45.83% | 61.46% | |||
| 5 | W Pawlik-*,L Ohrysko-P Klapper | 7 | NS | 4![]() | S | 4 | = | +620 | 16.67% | 58.01% | ||
| W Pawlik-L Ohrysko,P Klapper-* | 8 | WE | 6![]() | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 61.01% | |||
| W Pawlik-P Klapper,*-L Ohrysko | 9 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | +1 | -170 | 79.17% | 62.22% | |||
| 6 | K Jassem-A Ratyński,*-T Townsend | 10 | WE | 3![]() | W | 10 | = | +600 | 91.67% | 64.06% | ||
| K Jassem-*,T Townsend-A Ratyński | 11 | NS | 6![]() | E | 2 | -1 | +50 | 87.50% | 65.44% | |||
| K Jassem-T Townsend,A Ratyński-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | N | 2 | = | -620 | 0.00% | 61.81% | |||
| 7 | B Szulejewski-*,S Stachlewski-J Rymwid | 13 | NS | 1![]() | W | 5 | +1 | -120 | 41.67% | 60.75% | ||
| B Szulejewski-S Stachlewski,J Rymwid-* | 14 | WE | 4![]() | E | 9 | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 57.71% | |||
| B Szulejewski-J Rymwid,*-S Stachlewski | 15 | WE | 4![]() | W | Q | +3 | +510 | 37.50% | 56.75% | |||
| 8 | W Gaweł-*,W Olański-L Ohrysko | 16 | NS | 1![]() | W | 2 | +1 | -120 | 0.00% | 54.17% | ||
| W Gaweł-W Olański,L Ohrysko-* | 17 | WE | 3![]() | W | 9 | +1 | +430 | 62.50% | 54.53% | |||
| W Gaweł-L Ohrysko,*-W Olański | 18 | WE | 3![]() | W | 2 | -1 | -50 | 62.50% | 54.86% | |||
| 9 | A Kowalski-L Zakrzewski,*-K Puczyński | 19 | WE | 4 × | E | A | -2 | -500 | 0.00% | 52.67% | ||
| A Kowalski-*,K Puczyński-L Zakrzewski | 20 | NS | 2![]() | E | 4 | +3 | -200 | 83.33% | 53.85% | |||
| A Kowalski-K Puczyński,L Zakrzewski-* | 21 | WE | 4 × | N | 2 | -1 | +200 | 66.67% | 54.32% | |||
| 10 | L Zakrzewski-K Puczyński,*-P Szymonik | 22 | WE | 4 × | S | J | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 55.95% | ||
| L Zakrzewski-*,P Szymonik-K Puczyński | 23 | NS | 2![]() | E | 8 | -1 | +100 | 62.50% | 56.18% | |||
| L Zakrzewski-P Szymonik,K Puczyński-* | 24 | WE | 2![]() | N | A | -1 | +50 | 58.33% | 56.25% | |||
| 11 | K Martens-R Dancewicz,A Kowalski-* | 25 | WE | 6![]() | N | K | +1 | -940 | 58.33% | 56.32% | ||
| K Martens-A Kowalski,*-R Dancewicz | 26 | WE | 5![]() | N | J | +2 | -710 | 16.67% | 55.08% | |||
| K Martens-*,R Dancewicz-A Kowalski | 27 | NS | 4![]() | W | 2 | +1 | -450 | 29.17% | 54.29% | |||
| SUMA: | 54.29% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 44.74% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 48.94% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 33 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-04-14 o 22:57:38