forumbridge.pl TOPi 2013 - FINAŁ 26: A Kowalski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | P Krajewski-*,K Martens-Ł Brede | 19 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -2 | -300 | 12.50% | 12.50% | ||
P Krajewski-K Martens,Ł Brede-* | 20 | WE | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | +800 | 95.83% | 54.17% | |||
P Krajewski-Ł Brede,*-K Martens | 21 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | = | -620 | 16.67% | 41.67% | |||
2 | B Chmurski-M Krupowicz,*-M Nowosadzki | 22 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 75.00% | 50.00% | ||
B Chmurski-*,M Nowosadzki-M Krupowicz | 23 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 45.00% | |||
B Chmurski-M Nowosadzki,M Krupowicz-* | 24 | WE | 5![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | +300 | 100.00% | 54.17% | |||
3 | T Paluchowski-T Puczyński,W Pawlik-* | 1 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | -110 | 45.83% | 52.98% | ||
T Paluchowski-W Pawlik,*-T Puczyński | 2 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | -100 | 8.33% | 47.40% | |||
T Paluchowski-*,T Puczyński-W Pawlik | 3 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -630 | 20.83% | 44.44% | |||
4 | W Pawlik-P Krajewski,*-J Romański | 4 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -630 | 33.33% | 43.33% | ||
W Pawlik-*,J Romański-P Krajewski | 5 | NS | 1![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | -200 | 12.50% | 40.53% | |||
W Pawlik-J Romański,P Krajewski-* | 6 | WE | 6![]() | W | ![]() | = | +1370 | 54.17% | 41.67% | |||
5 | T Paluchowski-T Puczyński,M Puczyński-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | = | -620 | 83.33% | 44.87% | ||
T Paluchowski-M Puczyński,*-T Puczyński | 8 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +3 | -490 | 50.00% | 45.24% | |||
T Paluchowski-*,T Puczyński-M Puczyński | 9 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 42.22% | |||
6 | *-W Starkowski,J Kalita-K Puczyński | 10 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | +200 | 87.50% | 45.05% | ||
*-J Kalita,K Puczyński-W Starkowski | 11 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 33.33% | 44.36% | |||
*-K Puczyński,W Starkowski-J Kalita | 12 | NS | 5![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 50.00% | 44.68% | |||
7 | R Pepłoński-*,A Górzyński-E Kowalewski | 13 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | = | -120 | 41.67% | 44.52% | ||
R Pepłoński-A Górzyński,E Kowalewski-* | 14 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | = | +420 | 37.50% | 44.17% | |||
R Pepłoński-E Kowalewski,*-A Górzyński | 15 | WE | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +3 | +510 | 37.50% | 43.85% | |||
8 | M Puczyński-K Puczyński,*-L Zakrzewski | 16 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | -200 | 50.00% | 44.13% | ||
M Puczyński-*,L Zakrzewski-K Puczyński | 17 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -430 | 37.50% | 43.84% | |||
M Puczyński-L Zakrzewski,K Puczyński-* | 18 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 62.50% | 44.62% | |||
9 | *-L Zakrzewski,A Zakrzewski-K Puczyński | 19 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 46.83% | ||
*-A Zakrzewski,K Puczyński-L Zakrzewski | 20 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +3 | -200 | 83.33% | 48.24% | |||
*-K Puczyński,L Zakrzewski-A Zakrzewski | 21 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -200 | 33.33% | 47.69% | |||
10 | P Krajewski-K Martens,*-R Dancewicz | 22 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 62.50% | 48.21% | ||
P Krajewski-*,R Dancewicz-K Martens | 23 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 16.67% | 47.13% | |||
P Krajewski-R Dancewicz,K Martens-* | 24 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | = | +110 | 79.17% | 48.19% | |||
11 | K Martens-R Dancewicz,*-A Zakrzewski | 25 | WE | 6![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -940 | 58.33% | 48.52% | ||
K Martens-*,A Zakrzewski-R Dancewicz | 26 | NS | 5![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | +710 | 83.33% | 49.61% | |||
K Martens-A Zakrzewski,R Dancewicz-* | 27 | WE | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 70.83% | 50.25% | |||
SUMA: | 50.25% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 50.69% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 50.50% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 24 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-04-14 o 22:57:38