| forumbridge.pl TOPi 2013 - FINAŁ 2: A Górzyński | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | J Blajda-W Olański,*-K Puczyński | 19 | WE | 2![]() | W | K | -2 | -200 | 16.67% | 16.67% | ||
| J Blajda-*,K Puczyński-W Olański | 20 | NS | 3 × | S | K | -3 | -800 | 4.17% | 10.42% | |||
| J Blajda-K Puczyński,W Olański-* | 21 | WE | 3![]() | N | K | +1 | -170 | 41.67% | 20.83% | |||
| 2 | *-P Klapper,L Zakrzewski-R Pepłoński | 22 | NS | 2![]() | N | K | +1 | +140 | 75.00% | 34.38% | ||
| *-L Zakrzewski,R Pepłoński-P Klapper | 23 | NS | 1![]() | N | K | +1 | +120 | 91.67% | 45.83% | |||
| *-R Pepłoński,P Klapper-L Zakrzewski | 24 | NS | 3![]() | N | 8 | -3 | -150 | 8.33% | 39.58% | |||
| 3 | J Kalita-A Zakrzewski,G Gardynik-* | 1 | WE | 5![]() | N | 2 | = | -400 | 25.00% | 37.50% | ||
| J Kalita-G Gardynik,*-A Zakrzewski | 2 | WE | 2![]() | E | 2 | = | +120 | 87.50% | 43.75% | |||
| J Kalita-*,A Zakrzewski-G Gardynik | 3 | NS | 3 × | N | 2 | -2 | -300 | 37.50% | 43.06% | |||
| 4 | P Klapper-W Starkowski,*-K Puczyński | 4 | WE | 3![]() | S | K | +2 | -660 | 8.33% | 39.58% | ||
| P Klapper-*,K Puczyński-W Starkowski | 5 | NS | 2![]() | N | A | -1 | -100 | 75.00% | 42.80% | |||
| P Klapper-K Puczyński,W Starkowski-* | 6 | WE | 4![]() | E | 8 | +2 | +680 | 0.00% | 39.24% | |||
| 5 | G Gardynik-*,L Zakrzewski-K Puczyński | 7 | NS | 6![]() | S | A | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 36.22% | ||
| G Gardynik-L Zakrzewski,K Puczyński-* | 8 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | +3 | -490 | 50.00% | 37.20% | |||
| G Gardynik-K Puczyński,*-L Zakrzewski | 9 | WE | 3![]() | N | 6 | +2 | -460 | 25.00% | 36.39% | |||
| 6 | T Puczyński-J Janowski,I Chalupec-* | 10 | WE | 2![]() | W | 7 | -1 | -100 | 45.83% | 36.98% | ||
| T Puczyński-I Chalupec,*-J Janowski | 11 | WE | 4![]() | W | 2 | +1 | +450 | 45.83% | 37.50% | |||
| T Puczyński-*,J Janowski-I Chalupec | 12 | NS | 5![]() | S | 7 | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 35.42% | |||
| 7 | R Pepłoński-A Kowalski,*-E Kowalewski | 13 | WE | 2![]() | E | 5 | = | +120 | 58.33% | 36.62% | ||
| R Pepłoński-*,E Kowalewski-A Kowalski | 14 | NS | 4![]() | E | 9 | = | -420 | 62.50% | 37.92% | |||
| R Pepłoński-E Kowalewski,A Kowalski-* | 15 | WE | 4![]() | W | Q | +3 | +510 | 37.50% | 37.90% | |||
| 8 | *-I Chalupec,J Kalita-E Kowalewski | 16 | NS | 2![]() | W | 10 | = | -90 | 16.67% | 36.93% | ||
| *-J Kalita,E Kowalewski-I Chalupec | 17 | NS | 2![]() | E | 2 | +1 | -150 | 91.67% | 39.31% | |||
| *-E Kowalewski,I Chalupec-J Kalita | 18 | NS | 3![]() | E | 2 | +1 | -430 | 8.33% | 38.02% | |||
| 9 | P Siemaszko-I Chalupec,*-E Kowalewski | 19 | WE | 2![]() | N | J | = | -110 | 41.67% | 38.17% | ||
| P Siemaszko-*,E Kowalewski-I Chalupec | 20 | NS | 2 × | N | 8 | -5 | -1400 | 0.00% | 36.70% | |||
| P Siemaszko-E Kowalewski,I Chalupec-* | 21 | WE | 5 × | N | 2 | -2 | +500 | 91.67% | 38.73% | |||
| 10 | *-E Kowalewski,P Siemaszko-I Chalupec | 22 | NS | 2![]() | N | A | = | +110 | 66.67% | 39.73% | ||
| *-P Siemaszko,I Chalupec-E Kowalewski | 23 | NS | 4 × | W | Q | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 41.81% | |||
| *-I Chalupec,E Kowalewski-P Siemaszko | 24 | NS | 2![]() | E | 9 | = | -110 | 20.83% | 41.11% | |||
| 11 | P Siemaszko-I Chalupec,*-E Kowalewski | 25 | WE | 3![]() | S | 8 | +4 | -520 | 91.67% | 42.74% | ||
| P Siemaszko-*,E Kowalewski-I Chalupec | 26 | NS | 4![]() | S | J | +2 | +680 | 45.83% | 42.84% | |||
| P Siemaszko-E Kowalewski,I Chalupec-* | 27 | WE | 4![]() | W | K | +1 | +450 | 70.83% | 43.69% | |||
| SUMA: | 43.69% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 47.02% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 45.56% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 47 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-04-14 o 22:57:37