Finał GPPP - eliminacje open 9: I Kowalczyk | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek,*-T Wiśniewski | 1 | WE | 4 | N | 4 | +1 | -450 | 68.18% | 68.18% | ||
W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek,*-T Wiśniewski | 2 | WE | 5 | S | K | -2 | +200 | 86.36% | 77.27% | |||
2 | *-T Wiśniewski,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 3 | NS | 2 | N | 10 | +1 | +140 | 81.82% | 78.79% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 4 | NS | 4 | S | A | = | +620 | 77.27% | 78.41% | |||
3 | W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,*-T Wiśniewski | 5 | WE | 6 | E | 5 | +1 | +1020 | 50.00% | 72.73% | ||
W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,*-T Wiśniewski | 6 | WE | 4 | N | 6 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 77.27% | |||
4 | *-T Wiśniewski,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 7 | NS | 2 | N | 6 | = | +110 | 86.36% | 78.57% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 8 | NS | 4 | W | K | -2 | +100 | 18.18% | 71.02% | |||
5 | D Filipowicz-K Martens,*-T Wiśniewski | 9 | WE | 4 | E | 8 | = | +620 | 59.09% | 69.70% | ||
D Filipowicz-K Martens,*-T Wiśniewski | 10 | WE | 4× | N | K | -4 | +1100 | 81.82% | 70.91% | |||
6 | L Majdański-A Pawlak,*-T Wiśniewski | 11 | WE | 4 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 72.73% | 71.07% | ||
L Majdański-A Pawlak,*-T Wiśniewski | 12 | WE | 2 | S | K | -4 | +400 | 100.00% | 73.48% | |||
7 | B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,*-T Wiśniewski | 13 | WE | 5 | E | A | +1 | +620 | 31.82% | 70.28% | ||
B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,*-T Wiśniewski | 14 | WE | 2 | N | 6 | +1 | -140 | 40.91% | 68.18% | |||
8 | T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,*-T Wiśniewski | 15 | WE | 5× | W | K | -2 | -300 | 36.36% | 66.06% | ||
T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,*-T Wiśniewski | 16 | WE | 4 | W | 5 | = | +620 | 13.64% | 62.78% | |||
9 | M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,*-T Wiśniewski | 17 | WE | 3× | W | 6 | -1 | -100 | 54.55% | 62.30% | ||
M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,*-T Wiśniewski | 18 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | -630 | 13.64% | 59.60% | |||
10 | *-T Wiśniewski,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 19 | NS | 3 | W | K | +2 | -200 | 100.00% | 61.72% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 20 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | = | +600 | 63.64% | 61.82% | |||
11 | *-T Wiśniewski,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 21 | NS | 2 | S | 5 | +1 | +140 | 27.27% | 60.17% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 22 | NS | 4 | W | 4 | -1 | +100 | 77.27% | 60.95% | |||
12 | *-T Wiśniewski,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 23 | NS | 4× | S | A | -2 | -500 | 59.09% | 60.87% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 24 | NS | 6 | E | 10 | = | -990 | 9.09% | 58.71% | |||
13 | *-T Wiśniewski,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 25 | NS | 6 | E | K | -1 | +100 | 59.09% | 58.73% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 26 | NS | 5× | N | 9 | = | +850 | 86.36% | 59.79% | |||
14 | W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,*-T Wiśniewski | 27 | WE | 3 | W | 9 | -2 | -100 | 45.45% | 59.26% | ||
W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,*-T Wiśniewski | 28 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | +2 | -690 | 0.00% | 57.14% | |||
15 | *-T Wiśniewski,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 29 | NS | 4 | N | Q | = | +620 | 72.73% | 57.68% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 30 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | -2 | +100 | 90.91% | 58.79% | |||
16 | P Zatorski-E Vainikonis,*-T Wiśniewski | 1 | WE | 4 | E | K | -2 | -100 | 18.18% | 57.48% | ||
P Zatorski-E Vainikonis,*-T Wiśniewski | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | -1 | -50 | 22.73% | 56.39% | |||
17 | *-T Wiśniewski,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 3 | NS | 3 | S | A | -1 | -50 | 72.73% | 56.89% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 4 | NS | 2 | W | 6 | -2 | +200 | 95.45% | 58.02% | |||
18 | *-T Wiśniewski,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 5 | NS | 2 | W | K | -1 | +50 | 86.36% | 58.83% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 6 | NS | 4 | S | 10 | +2 | +490 | 27.27% | 57.95% | |||
19 | S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,*-T Wiśniewski | 7 | WE | 2× | S | 4 | = | -670 | 9.09% | 56.63% | ||
S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,*-T Wiśniewski | 8 | WE | 2 | N | K | +2 | -170 | 13.64% | 55.50% | |||
20 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-T Wiśniewski | 9 | WE | 3 | S | 10 | +2 | -150 | 36.36% | 55.01% | ||
T Kaczanowski-K Antas,*-T Wiśniewski | 10 | WE | 2 | S | A | -2 | +200 | 95.45% | 56.02% | |||
21 | *-T Wiśniewski,S Henclik-K Sikorski | 11 | NS | 4 | W | 2 | +2 | -490 | 36.36% | 55.54% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,S Henclik-K Sikorski | 12 | NS | 4 | N | 10 | = | +620 | 45.45% | 55.30% | |||
22 | *-T Wiśniewski,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 13 | NS | 1 | S | Q | = | +90 | 22.73% | 54.55% | ||
*-T Wiśniewski,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 14 | NS | 3 | E | J | = | -110 | 0.00% | 53.31% | |||
23 | P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-T Wiśniewski | 15 | WE | 3 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 77.27% | 53.84% | ||
P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-T Wiśniewski | 16 | WE | 4 | S | A | -1 | +50 | 86.36% | 54.55% | |||
SUMA: | 54.55% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 56.92% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 55.73% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 9 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:05:19