Finał GPPP - eliminacje open 23: P Zatorski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-E Vainikonis,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 1 | NS | 4 | S | J | +3 | +510 | 90.91% | 90.91% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 2 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | -1 | -100 | 54.55% | 72.73% | |||
2 | *-E Vainikonis,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 3 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | -2 | -100 | 36.36% | 60.61% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 4 | NS | 4 | N | 9 | = | +620 | 77.27% | 64.77% | |||
3 | *-E Vainikonis,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 5 | NS | 6 | E | 6 | +1 | -1020 | 50.00% | 61.82% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 6 | NS | 3 | S | 9 | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 53.79% | |||
4 | *-E Vainikonis,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 7 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | = | -110 | 45.45% | 52.60% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 8 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | = | +140 | 59.09% | 53.41% | |||
5 | S Henclik-K Sikorski,*-E Vainikonis | 9 | WE | 4 | E | 3 | = | +620 | 59.09% | 54.04% | ||
S Henclik-K Sikorski,*-E Vainikonis | 10 | WE | 5× | S | A | -4 | +1100 | 81.82% | 56.82% | |||
6 | *-E Vainikonis,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 11 | NS | 3 | S | Q | = | +140 | 81.82% | 59.09% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 12 | NS | 3 | E | K | -1 | +50 | 72.73% | 60.23% | |||
7 | P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-E Vainikonis | 13 | WE | 3 | E | J | +3 | +170 | 9.09% | 56.29% | ||
P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki,*-E Vainikonis | 14 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | +1 | -140 | 40.91% | 55.19% | |||
8 | *-E Vainikonis,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 15 | NS | 5× | W | K | -2 | +300 | 63.64% | 55.76% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 16 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | +1 | -650 | 31.82% | 54.26% | |||
9 | *-E Vainikonis,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 17 | NS | 4× | W | A | -2 | +300 | 86.36% | 56.15% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 18 | NS | 5× | N | Q | = | +750 | 100.00% | 58.59% | |||
10 | W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,*-E Vainikonis | 19 | WE | 4× | N | K | -2 | +300 | 13.64% | 56.22% | ||
W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,*-E Vainikonis | 20 | WE | 3 | S | J | = | -600 | 36.36% | 55.23% | |||
11 | S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki,*-E Vainikonis | 21 | WE | 2 | S | 8 | +2 | -170 | 18.18% | 53.46% | ||
S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki,*-E Vainikonis | 22 | WE | 3× | N | 6 | -1 | +100 | 54.55% | 53.51% | |||
12 | *-E Vainikonis,D Filipowicz-K Martens | 23 | NS | 5 | W | 5 | = | -650 | 13.64% | 51.78% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,D Filipowicz-K Martens | 24 | NS | 6 | W | Q | = | -990 | 9.09% | 50.00% | |||
13 | *-E Vainikonis,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 25 | NS | 6 | E | K | -2 | +200 | 90.91% | 51.64% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 26 | NS | 5× | N | 9 | = | +850 | 86.36% | 52.97% | |||
14 | B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,*-E Vainikonis | 27 | WE | 3 | W | 5 | -1 | -50 | 68.18% | 53.54% | ||
B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,*-E Vainikonis | 28 | WE | 5 | N | 6 | = | -650 | 45.45% | 53.25% | |||
15 | T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,*-E Vainikonis | 29 | WE | 4 | N | Q | -1 | +100 | 72.73% | 53.92% | ||
T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,*-E Vainikonis | 30 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | = | +110 | 68.18% | 54.39% | |||
16 | *-E Vainikonis,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 1 | NS | 4 | E | K | -2 | +100 | 81.82% | 55.28% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 2 | NS | 3 | E | 8 | -1 | +50 | 77.27% | 55.97% | |||
17 | S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,*-E Vainikonis | 3 | WE | 3 | S | A | -3 | +150 | 68.18% | 56.34% | ||
S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,*-E Vainikonis | 4 | WE | 2 | W | 6 | = | +110 | 59.09% | 56.42% | |||
18 | *-E Vainikonis,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 5 | NS | 1 | W | 5 | -1 | +50 | 86.36% | 57.27% | ||
*-E Vainikonis,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 6 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +4 | +520 | 59.09% | 57.32% | |||
19 | B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski,*-E Vainikonis | 7 | WE | 2 | E | 5 | -1 | -100 | 40.91% | 56.88% | ||
B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski,*-E Vainikonis | 8 | WE | 2 | N | K | +1 | -140 | 45.45% | 56.58% | |||
20 | M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,*-E Vainikonis | 9 | WE | 3 | N | 6 | +1 | -430 | 27.27% | 55.83% | ||
M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,*-E Vainikonis | 10 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | -1 | +100 | 68.18% | 56.14% | |||
21 | W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,*-E Vainikonis | 11 | WE | 6 | W | 4 | = | +990 | 90.91% | 56.98% | ||
W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,*-E Vainikonis | 12 | WE | 4 | N | 9 | = | -620 | 54.55% | 56.93% | |||
22 | B Chmurski-S Pająk,*-E Vainikonis | 13 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | -130 | 31.82% | 56.34% | ||
B Chmurski-S Pająk,*-E Vainikonis | 14 | WE | 3 | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 31.82% | 55.79% | |||
23 | M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,*-E Vainikonis | 15 | WE | 3 | S | K | -1 | +100 | 90.91% | 56.57% | ||
M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,*-E Vainikonis | 16 | WE | 3 | S | A | = | -110 | 59.09% | 56.62% | |||
SUMA: | 56.62% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 59.45% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 58.04% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 2 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:05:19