Finał GPPP - eliminacje open 114: P Nawrocki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,P Wiankowski-* | 1 | WE | 6 | S | A | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,P Wiankowski-* | 2 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | -1 | +100 | 45.45% | 72.73% | |||
2 | J Ciechomski-W Burakowski,P Wiankowski-* | 3 | WE | 3 | N | A | -1 | +50 | 45.45% | 63.64% | ||
J Ciechomski-W Burakowski,P Wiankowski-* | 4 | WE | 4 | N | 3 | = | -620 | 22.73% | 53.41% | |||
3 | P Wiankowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 5 | NS | 7 | W | 2 | = | -1440 | 18.18% | 46.36% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 6 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +1 | +430 | 77.27% | 51.52% | |||
4 | P Wiankowski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 7 | NS | 3 | W | Q | +1 | -130 | 9.09% | 45.45% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 8 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | = | +140 | 59.09% | 47.16% | |||
5 | W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,P Wiankowski-* | 9 | WE | 4 | E | Q | = | +620 | 59.09% | 48.48% | ||
W Gaweł-R Jagniewski,P Wiankowski-* | 10 | WE | 4 | E | 9 | +1 | +650 | 50.00% | 48.64% | |||
6 | B Chmurski-S Pająk,P Wiankowski-* | 11 | WE | 2 | E | 3 | = | +110 | 90.91% | 52.48% | ||
B Chmurski-S Pająk,P Wiankowski-* | 12 | WE | 2 | W | 2 | = | +110 | 63.64% | 53.41% | |||
7 | P Wiankowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 13 | NS | 3 | E | J | +3 | -170 | 90.91% | 56.29% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 14 | NS | 2 | N | 2 | +1 | +140 | 59.09% | 56.49% | |||
8 | J Wojcieszek-P Jassem,P Wiankowski-* | 15 | WE | 5× | S | 8 | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 59.39% | ||
J Wojcieszek-P Jassem,P Wiankowski-* | 16 | WE | 4 | W | 5 | +1 | +650 | 68.18% | 59.94% | |||
9 | P Wiankowski-*,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 17 | NS | 3 | W | A | = | -140 | 18.18% | 57.49% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,T Winciorek-M Krupowicz | 18 | NS | 3× | E | J | -1 | +100 | 45.45% | 56.82% | |||
10 | S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,P Wiankowski-* | 19 | WE | 5× | S | 3 | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 59.09% | ||
S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,P Wiankowski-* | 20 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | -1 | +100 | 63.64% | 59.32% | |||
11 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,P Wiankowski-* | 21 | WE | 2 | S | 5 | +2 | -170 | 18.18% | 57.36% | ||
T Kaczanowski-K Antas,P Wiankowski-* | 22 | WE | 3 | S | A | = | -140 | 9.09% | 55.17% | |||
12 | S Henclik-K Sikorski,P Wiankowski-* | 23 | WE | 5 | W | 4 | -1 | -100 | 9.09% | 53.16% | ||
S Henclik-K Sikorski,P Wiankowski-* | 24 | WE | 7× | W | A | -1 | -100 | 13.64% | 51.52% | |||
13 | A Wujków-J Śmieszek,P Wiankowski-* | 25 | WE | 6 | E | 9 | -2 | -200 | 9.09% | 49.82% | ||
A Wujków-J Śmieszek,P Wiankowski-* | 26 | WE | 5× | N | A | = | -850 | 13.64% | 48.43% | |||
14 | M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,P Wiankowski-* | 27 | WE | 3× | S | 4 | -2 | +300 | 95.45% | 50.17% | ||
M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,P Wiankowski-* | 28 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | +2 | -680 | 9.09% | 48.70% | |||
15 | P Wiankowski-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 29 | NS | 4 | N | 6 | -2 | -200 | 4.55% | 47.18% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 30 | NS | 3 | W | 2 | -2 | +100 | 90.91% | 48.64% | |||
16 | P Wiankowski-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 1 | NS | 4 | S | 6 | -1 | -50 | 63.64% | 49.12% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 2 | NS | 2 | E | 8 | -1 | +50 | 77.27% | 50.00% | |||
17 | P Wiankowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 3 | NS | 3 | N | A | -1 | -50 | 72.73% | 50.69% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,W Starkowski-P Tuszyński | 4 | NS | 2 | E | 6 | -2 | +200 | 95.45% | 52.01% | |||
18 | P Wiankowski-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 5 | NS | 2 | E | 6 | = | -110 | 31.82% | 51.43% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 6 | NS | 6 | N | 6 | +1 | +940 | 86.36% | 52.40% | |||
19 | D Filipowicz-K Martens,P Wiankowski-* | 7 | WE | 3× | E | 6 | -3 | -800 | 0.00% | 50.98% | ||
D Filipowicz-K Martens,P Wiankowski-* | 8 | WE | 2 | N | K | = | -110 | 77.27% | 51.67% | |||
20 | P Wiankowski-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 9 | NS | 3 | N | 6 | = | +110 | 27.27% | 51.05% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 10 | NS | 2 | N | 6 | -1 | -100 | 31.82% | 50.57% | |||
21 | B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,P Wiankowski-* | 11 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | +2 | +460 | 36.36% | 50.22% | ||
B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,P Wiankowski-* | 12 | WE | 4 | N | 6 | = | -620 | 54.55% | 50.32% | |||
22 | P Wiankowski-*,T Paluchowski-A Sarniak | 13 | NS | 3 | N | Q | +1 | +130 | 68.18% | 50.74% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,T Paluchowski-A Sarniak | 14 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | -1 | +50 | 86.36% | 51.55% | |||
23 | P Wiankowski-*,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 15 | NS | 3 | E | A | -1 | +50 | 22.73% | 50.91% | ||
P Wiankowski-*,I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski | 16 | NS | 4 | S | A | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 50.10% | |||
SUMA: | 50.10% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 27.22% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 38.66% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 48 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:05:20