Finał GPPP - eliminacje open 113: W Burakowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | A Wujków-J Śmieszek,J Ciechomski-* | 1 | WE | 4 | S | A | +1 | -450 | 68.18% | 68.18% | ||
A Wujków-J Śmieszek,J Ciechomski-* | 2 | WE | 5 | S | 10 | -1 | +100 | 45.45% | 56.82% | |||
2 | J Ciechomski-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 3 | NS | 3 | N | A | -1 | -50 | 54.55% | 56.06% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 4 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | = | +620 | 77.27% | 61.36% | |||
3 | J Ciechomski-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 5 | NS | 3 | E | K | +4 | -520 | 86.36% | 66.36% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 6 | NS | 3 | S | 9 | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 57.58% | |||
4 | P Zawada-W Strzemecki,J Ciechomski-* | 7 | WE | 3 | E | K | = | +110 | 54.55% | 57.14% | ||
P Zawada-W Strzemecki,J Ciechomski-* | 8 | WE | 3 | N | 6 | = | -140 | 40.91% | 55.11% | |||
5 | W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,J Ciechomski-* | 9 | WE | 4 | E | 5 | -1 | -100 | 9.09% | 50.00% | ||
W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,J Ciechomski-* | 10 | WE | 5× | S | J | -5 | +1400 | 100.00% | 55.00% | |||
6 | J Ciechomski-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 11 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | -1 | -50 | 31.82% | 52.89% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 12 | NS | 1 | W | 2 | +2 | -150 | 9.09% | 49.24% | |||
7 | D Filipowicz-K Martens,J Ciechomski-* | 13 | WE | 6× | E | A | = | +1540 | 100.00% | 53.15% | ||
D Filipowicz-K Martens,J Ciechomski-* | 14 | WE | 2 | S | 3 | +1 | -140 | 40.91% | 52.27% | |||
8 | J Ciechomski-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 15 | NS | 5× | W | 3 | -2 | +300 | 63.64% | 53.03% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 16 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | +1 | -650 | 31.82% | 51.70% | |||
9 | B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,J Ciechomski-* | 17 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | = | -130 | 40.91% | 51.07% | ||
B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak,J Ciechomski-* | 18 | WE | 4 | S | 8 | -1 | +100 | 77.27% | 52.53% | |||
10 | T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,J Ciechomski-* | 19 | WE | 5× | S | A | -2 | +300 | 13.64% | 50.48% | ||
T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,J Ciechomski-* | 20 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | -630 | 13.64% | 48.64% | |||
11 | I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,J Ciechomski-* | 21 | WE | 2 | S | 5 | +1 | -140 | 72.73% | 49.78% | ||
I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,J Ciechomski-* | 22 | WE | 4 | W | 4 | -1 | -100 | 22.73% | 48.55% | |||
12 | S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,J Ciechomski-* | 23 | WE | 4× | S | A | -2 | +500 | 40.91% | 48.22% | ||
S Niajko-Ł Witkowski,J Ciechomski-* | 24 | WE | 7 | W | A | -1 | -50 | 36.36% | 47.73% | |||
13 | M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,J Ciechomski-* | 25 | WE | 3 | W | 10 | +2 | +660 | 68.18% | 48.55% | ||
M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,J Ciechomski-* | 26 | WE | 5× | N | 8 | -1 | +200 | 54.55% | 48.78% | |||
14 | J Ciechomski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 27 | NS | 4× | W | 3 | -2 | +300 | 90.91% | 50.34% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski | 28 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | +1 | +650 | 54.55% | 50.49% | |||
15 | J Ciechomski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 29 | NS | 4 | N | Q | = | +620 | 72.73% | 51.25% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,M Nowosadzki-J Kalita | 30 | NS | 2 | E | 9 | = | -110 | 31.82% | 50.61% | |||
16 | J Ciechomski-*,W Gaweł-R Jagniewski | 1 | NS | 5 | N | K | -3 | -150 | 22.73% | 49.71% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,W Gaweł-R Jagniewski | 2 | NS | 2 | E | A | = | -120 | 45.45% | 49.57% | |||
17 | J Ciechomski-*,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 3 | NS | 3 | S | 3 | -4 | -200 | 9.09% | 48.35% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,B Chmurski-S Pająk | 4 | NS | 2 | N | 3 | -2 | -200 | 9.09% | 47.19% | |||
18 | P Zatorski-E Vainikonis,J Ciechomski-* | 5 | WE | 1 | W | 5 | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 46.23% | ||
P Zatorski-E Vainikonis,J Ciechomski-* | 6 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +4 | -520 | 40.91% | 46.09% | |||
19 | J Ciechomski-*,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 7 | NS | 2 | W | J | +1 | -110 | 0.00% | 44.84% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,J Wojcieszek-P Jassem | 8 | NS | 2 | N | 5 | = | +110 | 22.73% | 44.26% | |||
20 | T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,J Ciechomski-* | 9 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | = | -110 | 72.73% | 44.99% | ||
T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,J Ciechomski-* | 10 | WE | 2 | W | K | -1 | -100 | 13.64% | 44.20% | |||
21 | J Ciechomski-*,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 11 | NS | 3 | W | 4 | +3 | -490 | 36.36% | 44.01% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz | 12 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | = | +620 | 45.45% | 44.05% | |||
22 | J Ciechomski-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 13 | NS | 2 | E | A | -1 | +100 | 36.36% | 43.87% | ||
J Ciechomski-*,T Kaczanowski-K Antas | 14 | NS | 3 | S | J | -2 | -100 | 31.82% | 43.60% | |||
23 | S Henclik-K Sikorski,J Ciechomski-* | 15 | WE | 3 | W | 6 | = | +400 | 100.00% | 44.85% | ||
S Henclik-K Sikorski,J Ciechomski-* | 16 | WE | 4 | S | A | -1 | +50 | 86.36% | 45.75% | |||
SUMA: | 45.75% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 56.71% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 51.23% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 33 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:05:20