Finał GPPP - eliminacje open 110: K Sikorski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski,S Henclik-* | 1 | WE | 4 | S | 5 | +2 | -480 | 27.27% | 27.27% | ||
B Szulejewski-P Janiszewski,S Henclik-* | 2 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | +100 | 45.45% | 36.36% | |||
2 | M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,S Henclik-* | 3 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 45.45% | 39.39% | ||
M Nowosadzki-J Kalita,S Henclik-* | 4 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | +2 | -170 | 72.73% | 47.73% | |||
3 | S Henclik-*,W Gaweł-R Jagniewski | 5 | NS | 6 | W | 2 | +1 | -1020 | 50.00% | 48.18% | ||
S Henclik-*,W Gaweł-R Jagniewski | 6 | NS | 3 | N | Q | +1 | +430 | 77.27% | 53.03% | |||
4 | B Chmurski-S Pająk,S Henclik-* | 7 | WE | 3 | E | Q | = | +110 | 54.55% | 53.25% | ||
B Chmurski-S Pająk,S Henclik-* | 8 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | = | -140 | 40.91% | 51.70% | |||
5 | S Henclik-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 9 | NS | 4 | E | 3 | = | -620 | 40.91% | 50.51% | ||
S Henclik-*,P Zatorski-E Vainikonis | 10 | NS | 5× | S | A | -4 | -1100 | 18.18% | 47.27% | |||
6 | J Wojcieszek-P Jassem,S Henclik-* | 11 | WE | 2 | N | J | +1 | -140 | 18.18% | 44.63% | ||
J Wojcieszek-P Jassem,S Henclik-* | 12 | WE | 3 | S | K | = | -110 | 4.55% | 41.29% | |||
7 | T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,S Henclik-* | 13 | WE | 5 | E | A | +1 | +620 | 31.82% | 40.56% | ||
T Winciorek-M Krupowicz,S Henclik-* | 14 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | = | -140 | 40.91% | 40.58% | |||
8 | S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,S Henclik-* | 15 | WE | 5× | W | K | -2 | -300 | 36.36% | 40.30% | ||
S Kowalczyk-J Sucharkiewicz,S Henclik-* | 16 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +650 | 68.18% | 42.05% | |||
9 | T Kaczanowski-K Antas,S Henclik-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | -2 | +100 | 72.73% | 43.85% | ||
T Kaczanowski-K Antas,S Henclik-* | 18 | WE | 4 | N | Q | = | -130 | 40.91% | 43.69% | |||
10 | M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,S Henclik-* | 19 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | +1 | +630 | 50.00% | 44.02% | ||
M Klukowski-P Tuczyński,S Henclik-* | 20 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | -2 | +200 | 90.91% | 46.36% | |||
11 | S Henclik-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 21 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | +170 | 81.82% | 48.05% | ||
S Henclik-*,A Wujków-J Śmieszek | 22 | NS | 3 | W | 9 | = | -140 | 18.18% | 46.69% | |||
12 | S Henclik-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 23 | NS | 5 | W | 4 | -1 | +100 | 90.91% | 48.62% | ||
S Henclik-*,P Wiankowski-P Nawrocki | 24 | NS | 7× | W | A | -1 | +100 | 86.36% | 50.19% | |||
13 | S Henclik-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 25 | NS | 6 | E | K | = | -1370 | 0.00% | 48.18% | ||
S Henclik-*,W Kaźmierczak-G Głasek | 26 | NS | 5× | S | K | -1 | -200 | 45.45% | 48.08% | |||
14 | S Henclik-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 27 | NS | 4 | E | J | -3 | +150 | 81.82% | 49.33% | ||
S Henclik-*,P Zawada-W Strzemecki | 28 | NS | 4 | N | 6 | +1 | +650 | 54.55% | 49.51% | |||
15 | W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,S Henclik-* | 29 | WE | 4 | N | Q | -1 | +100 | 72.73% | 50.31% | ||
W Starkowski-P Tuszyński,S Henclik-* | 30 | WE | 2 | E | 3 | = | +110 | 68.18% | 50.91% | |||
16 | S Henclik-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 1 | NS | 3 | S | 6 | -1 | -50 | 63.64% | 51.32% | ||
S Henclik-*,S Gołębiowski-M Wręczycki | 2 | NS | 2 | E | 4 | +1 | -150 | 18.18% | 50.28% | |||
17 | D Filipowicz-K Martens,S Henclik-* | 3 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | -1 | +50 | 27.27% | 49.59% | ||
D Filipowicz-K Martens,S Henclik-* | 4 | WE | 2 | W | 6 | = | +110 | 59.09% | 49.87% | |||
18 | S Henclik-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 5 | NS | 2 | W | A | = | -110 | 31.82% | 49.35% | ||
S Henclik-*,L Majdański-A Pawlak | 6 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +4 | +520 | 59.09% | 49.62% | |||
19 | S Henclik-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 7 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | -1 | +100 | 59.09% | 49.88% | ||
S Henclik-*,B Gierulski-J Skrzypczak | 8 | NS | 2 | N | K | +1 | +140 | 54.55% | 50.00% | |||
20 | T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,S Henclik-* | 9 | WE | 3 | S | A | -1 | +50 | 95.45% | 51.17% | ||
T Paluchowski-A Sarniak,S Henclik-* | 10 | WE | 2 | S | 3 | -1 | +100 | 68.18% | 51.59% | |||
21 | I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,S Henclik-* | 11 | WE | 4 | W | 2 | +2 | +490 | 63.64% | 51.88% | ||
I Kowalczyk-T Wiśniewski,S Henclik-* | 12 | WE | 4 | N | 10 | = | -620 | 54.55% | 51.95% | |||
22 | S Henclik-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 13 | NS | 2 | W | 10 | = | -110 | 9.09% | 50.95% | ||
S Henclik-*,S Niajko-Ł Witkowski | 14 | NS | 3 | N | 10 | -2 | -100 | 31.82% | 50.52% | |||
23 | S Henclik-*,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 15 | NS | 3 | W | 6 | = | -400 | 0.00% | 49.39% | ||
S Henclik-*,J Ciechomski-W Burakowski | 16 | NS | 4 | S | A | -1 | -50 | 13.64% | 48.62% | |||
SUMA: | 48.62% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 55.63% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 52.12% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 26 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2014-01-08 o 15:05:20