ROUND 2, TABLE 36 | ||||||||||||||
29. INFRTU | VS | 75. WHY NOT | ||||||||||||
OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
NS: | NS: | |||||||||||||
EW: | EW: | |||||||||||||
contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
NS EW | NS EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |||||||||
2 | N | 10 | +1 | 140 | 41 | 3 | N | 10 | = | 140 | – | – | ||
3 | S | Q | = | 140 | 42 | 4 | N | J | = | 620 | 10 | |||
4 | W | A | +2 | -480 | 43 | 4 | W | Q | +1 | -450 | 1 | |||
2× | N | J | -2 | -500 | 44 | 3 | E | 10 | = | -400 | 3 | |||
6 | N | 7 | = | 1370 | 45 | 6 | N | 2 | = | 1370 | – | – | ||
4× | W | 8 | -2 | 300 | 46 | 2 | S | A | = | 120 | 5 | |||
3 | S | 6 | = | 600 | 47 | 3× | E | A | -3 | 500 | 3 | |||
4 | E | 3 | = | -620 | 48 | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | -650 | 1 | |||
IMP: | 9 | 14 | ||||||||||||
RESULT: | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 |