| ROUND 2, TABLE 5 | ||||||||||||||
| 52. EXCALIBUR | VS | 91. EGY SOR NEM SOR | ||||||||||||
| OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
| NS: | NS: | |||||||||||||
| EW: | EW: | |||||||||||||
| contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
| NS EW | NS EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |||||||||
3![]() | N | 8 | +1 | 430 | 1 | 3![]() | N | Q | = | 400 | 1 | |||
3![]() | E | 9 | -1 | 50 | 2 | 4![]() | E | 9 | -1 | 50 | – | – | ||
3![]() | W | 10 | = | -110 | 3 | 3![]() | E | 2 | +1 | -630 | 11 | |||
3![]() | E | A | = | -140 | 4 | 4 × | S | 2 | -2 | -500 | 8 | |||
4 × | N | J | = | 790 | 5 | 4![]() | N | 5 | = | 620 | 5 | |||
2 × | W | A | = | -670 | 6 | 4![]() | S | K | -2 | -100 | 11 | |||
2![]() | E | 2 | -2 | 200 | 7 | 3![]() | N | 5 | -5 | -500 | 12 | |||
5![]() | N | 3 | -1 | -50 | 8 | 5![]() | N | 2 | -1 | -50 | – | – | ||
| IMP: | 37 | 11 | ||||||||||||
| RESULT: | 11 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 | ||||||||||||||