PULA 2011- Individual 11: L Brede | ||||||||||||
round | opponents | board | line | cont ract | by | lead | tri cks | score | % | running score | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-M Nowosadzki,J Wojcieszek-J Maricic | 1 | NS | 2 | E | Q | +1 | -140 | 35.71% | 35.71% | ||
*-J Wojcieszek,J Maricic-M Nowosadzki | 2 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | -2 | -200 | 17.86% | 26.79% | |||
*-J Maricic,M Nowosadzki-J Wojcieszek | 3 | NS | 3 | S | Q | -1 | -50 | 39.29% | 30.95% | |||
2 | *-I Bunji,A Czech-O Kikic | 4 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | -4 | +400 | 85.71% | 44.64% | ||
*-A Czech,O Kikic-I Bunji | 5 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 55.71% | |||
*-O Kikic,I Bunji-A Czech | 6 | NS | 5 | S | 6 | -3 | -150 | 14.29% | 48.81% | |||
3 | *-J Pavsek,W Smaza-M Pietrzak | 7 | NS | 2 | E | 3 | +1 | -140 | 50.00% | 48.98% | ||
*-W Smaza,M Pietrzak-J Pavsek | 8 | NS | 2 | N | A | -1 | -50 | 39.29% | 47.77% | |||
*-M Pietrzak,J Pavsek-W Smaza | 9 | NS | 2 | W | 10 | +1 | -140 | 57.14% | 48.81% | |||
4 | *-W Chodzinski,K Wartlick-L Varga | 10 | NS | 5 | N | J | -1 | -100 | 28.57% | 46.79% | ||
*-K Wartlick,L Varga-W Chodzinski | 11 | NS | 1 | N | 6 | -1 | -50 | 25.00% | 44.81% | |||
*-L Varga,W Chodzinski-K Wartlick | 12 | NS | 2 | S | 5 | = | +90 | 75.00% | 47.32% | |||
5 | *-W Hackl,G Bikki-F Milic | 13 | NS | 3× | W | K | -5 | +1400 | 100.00% | 51.37% | ||
*-G Bikki,F Milic-W Hackl | 14 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | = | -420 | 57.14% | 51.79% | |||
*-F Milic,W Hackl-G Bikki | 15 | NS | 4 | N | K | = | +620 | 78.57% | 53.57% | |||
6 | M Witek-*,D Diklic-O Khyrivskyy | 16 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | +460 | 100.00% | 56.47% | ||
M Witek-D Diklic,O Khyrivskyy-* | 17 | WE | 2 | W | K | +2 | +170 | 75.00% | 57.56% | |||
M Witek-O Khyrivskyy,*-D Diklic | 18 | WE | 4 | E | J | +1 | +450 | 53.57% | 57.34% | |||
7 | M Tenn-*,R Konopka-I Skerjanc | 25 | NS | 2 | N | 5 | +1 | +140 | 89.29% | 59.02% | ||
M Tenn-R Konopka,I Skerjanc-* | 26 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | +2 | -660 | 25.00% | 57.32% | |||
M Tenn-I Skerjanc,*-R Konopka | 27 | WE | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | +450 | 57.14% | 57.31% | |||
8 | I Juracic-*,H De Wael-E Schnoell | 19 | NS | 5 | W | K | -2 | +200 | 96.43% | 59.09% | ||
I Juracic-H De Wael,E Schnoell-* | 20 | WE | 2 | W | 8 | -2 | -200 | 53.57% | 58.85% | |||
I Juracic-E Schnoell,*-H De Wael | 21 | WE | 4 | W | K | -2 | -100 | 10.71% | 56.85% | |||
9 | M Stefaniuk-*,P Aava-A Jost | 28 | NS | 3 | S | 7 | +1 | +630 | 75.00% | 57.57% | ||
M Stefaniuk-P Aava,A Jost-* | 29 | WE | 4 | E | 2 | -1 | -100 | 53.57% | 57.42% | |||
M Stefaniuk-A Jost,*-P Aava | 30 | WE | 3 | W | 8 | -2 | -100 | 7.14% | 55.56% | |||
10 | M Mirme-*,Z Petrovic-J Sadar | 22 | NS | 3 | S | 6 | +1 | +430 | 71.43% | 56.12% | ||
M Mirme-Z Petrovic,J Sadar-* | 23 | WE | 4 | S | 8 | +1 | -650 | 75.00% | 56.77% | |||
M Mirme-J Sadar,*-Z Petrovic | 24 | WE | 3 | N | J | +1 | -430 | 42.86% | 56.31% | |||
SUM: | 56.31% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
RESULT: | 56.31% | |||||||||||
PLACE: | 5 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romanski'2005, page generated 2011-09-09 at 18:12:14