| Turniej Indywidualny 205: P Tuszyński | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | B Ostrowski-*,S Brzozowski-M Kryniewski | 13 | NS | 4![]() | S | A | = | +620 | 63.24% | 63.24% | ||
| B Ostrowski-S Brzozowski,M Kryniewski-* | 14 | WE | 5![]() | W | 10 | -1 | -50 | 20.59% | 41.91% | |||
| B Ostrowski-M Kryniewski,*-S Brzozowski | 15 | WE | 5 × | N | Q | -2 | +500 | 80.88% | 54.90% | |||
| 2 | K Widerska-*,R Zubiel-G Gnacińska | 7 | NS | 4 × | S | K | -1 | -200 | 9.13% | 43.46% | ||
| K Widerska-R Zubiel,G Gnacińska-* | 8 | WE | 4![]() | N | 2 | +2 | -480 | 51.47% | 45.06% | |||
| K Widerska-G Gnacińska,*-R Zubiel | 9 | WE | 6![]() | N | A | = | -980 | 29.41% | 42.45% | |||
| 3 | W Kłobukowski-*,W Wejknis-R Jarmużewski | 1 | NS | APP | 60.00% | 44.96% | ||||||
| W Kłobukowski-W Wejknis,R Jarmużewski-* | 2 | WE | 3![]() | W | A | +1 | +170 | 51.47% | 45.77% | |||
| W Kłobukowski-R Jarmużewski,*-W Wejknis | 3 | WE | 2![]() | N | 6 | +2 | -130 | 82.35% | 49.84% | |||
| 4 | J Węgrzyn-*,Z Stawski-J Skrzypczak | 10 | NS | 2![]() | N | K | = | +110 | 50.00% | 49.85% | ||
| J Węgrzyn-Z Stawski,J Skrzypczak-* | 11 | WE | 2 × | N | A | -3 | +500 | 97.06% | 54.15% | |||
| J Węgrzyn-J Skrzypczak,*-Z Stawski | 12 | WE | 3![]() | E | 3 | = | +140 | 33.82% | 52.45% | |||
| 5 | P Gawryś-*,J Kudelski-H Szwarc | 4 | NS | 4![]() | E | J | +1 | -650 | 47.06% | 52.04% | ||
| P Gawryś-J Kudelski,H Szwarc-* | 5 | WE | 4![]() | E | J | = | +420 | 10.29% | 49.06% | |||
| P Gawryś-H Szwarc,*-J Kudelski | 6 | WE | 5![]() | W | A | +1 | +680 | 90.87% | 51.84% | |||
| 6 | K Beyer-*,Z Mikołajczyk-J Pęczkowski | 28 | NS | 3![]() | W | K | = | -400 | 94.12% | 54.49% | ||
| K Beyer-Z Mikołajczyk,J Pęczkowski-* | 29 | WE | 3![]() | N | 5 | +3 | -690 | 61.76% | 54.91% | |||
| K Beyer-J Pęczkowski,*-Z Mikołajczyk | 30 | WE | 3![]() | W | A | +1 | +170 | 45.59% | 54.40% | |||
| 7 | Ł Wilamowski-*,S Gołębiowski-A Żelazny | 22 | NS | 3![]() | W | J | -1 | +100 | 88.24% | 56.18% | ||
| Ł Wilamowski-S Gołębiowski,A Żelazny-* | 23 | WE | 4![]() | W | K | = | +620 | 67.65% | 56.75% | |||
| Ł Wilamowski-A Żelazny,*-S Gołębiowski | 24 | WE | 3![]() | W | K | +3 | +170 | 55.88% | 56.71% | |||
| 8 | M Nowosadzki-*,Z Łukaszuk-S Henclik | 16 | NS | 6![]() | E | 9 | +1 | -1470 | 64.71% | 57.07% | ||
| M Nowosadzki-Z Łukaszuk,S Henclik-* | 17 | WE | 4 × | N | A | +2 | -790 | 20.59% | 55.49% | |||
| M Nowosadzki-S Henclik,*-Z Łukaszuk | 18 | WE | 4![]() | E | 4 | -4 | -200 | 42.43% | 54.94% | |||
| 9 | S Czech-*,K Zając-J Kniga-Leosz | 25 | NS | 4![]() | N | A | -1 | -50 | 41.18% | 54.39% | ||
| S Czech-K Zając,J Kniga-Leosz-* | 26 | WE | 2![]() | N | 7 | = | -120 | 57.35% | 54.51% | |||
| S Czech-J Kniga-Leosz,*-K Zając | 27 | WE | 2![]() | E | 8 | +2 | +130 | 43.94% | 54.11% | |||
| 10 | E Bednarczyk-*,M Armatyński-G Sarkanas | 19 | NS | 4![]() | E | 3 | +2 | -690 | 42.65% | 53.70% | ||
| E Bednarczyk-M Armatyński,G Sarkanas-* | 20 | WE | 4 × | N | 10 | -3 | +800 | 92.65% | 55.05% | |||
| E Bednarczyk-G Sarkanas,*-M Armatyński | 21 | WE | 3![]() | N | Q | = | -600 | 74.91% | 55.71% | |||
| SUMA: | 55.71% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 55.71% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 23 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-07-22 o 14:29:53