| Turniej Indywidualny 106: G Sarkanas | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | J Żebrowski-W Kwiatkowski,*-A Witkowski | 1 | WE | 3![]() | S | 3 | = | -400 | 72.71% | 72.71% | ||
| J Żebrowski-*,A Witkowski-W Kwiatkowski | 2 | NS | 4 × | W | 10 | = | -590 | 14.71% | 43.71% | |||
| J Żebrowski-A Witkowski,W Kwiatkowski-* | 3 | WE | 3![]() | S | Q | +1 | -130 | 82.35% | 56.59% | |||
| 2 | Z Pinkiewicz-Z Kowalewski,*-Z Lasocki | 7 | WE | 4![]() | E | 7 | -1 | -100 | 31.84% | 50.40% | ||
| Z Pinkiewicz-*,Z Lasocki-Z Kowalewski | 8 | NS | 4![]() | N | 10 | +2 | +480 | 48.53% | 50.03% | |||
| Z Pinkiewicz-Z Lasocki,Z Kowalewski-* | 9 | WE | 5![]() | N | A | +1 | -480 | 98.53% | 58.11% | |||
| 3 | W Burakowski-J Kobylarski,*-M Niesłuchowski | 13 | WE | 4![]() | N | 5 | = | -620 | 36.76% | 55.06% | ||
| W Burakowski-*,M Niesłuchowski-J Kobylarski | 14 | NS | 6![]() | W | 6 | -1 | +50 | 79.41% | 58.10% | |||
| W Burakowski-M Niesłuchowski,J Kobylarski-* | 15 | WE | 6 × | S | 10 | -1 | +200 | 60.29% | 58.35% | |||
| 4 | W Cała-S Piepióra,*-W Starkowski | 4 | WE | 6![]() | E | Q | = | +1430 | 98.53% | 62.37% | ||
| W Cała-*,W Starkowski-S Piepióra | 5 | NS | 6![]() | W | 7 | = | -990 | 7.35% | 57.36% | |||
| W Cała-W Starkowski,S Piepióra-* | 6 | WE | 4![]() | W | A | +1 | +650 | 48.49% | 56.63% | |||
| 5 | T Kaczanowski-Z Skibicki,*-A Wujków | 10 | WE | 2![]() | S | 7 | +1 | -140 | 25.00% | 54.19% | ||
| T Kaczanowski-*,A Wujków-Z Skibicki | 11 | NS | 2 × | N | 5 | = | +470 | 95.59% | 57.15% | |||
| T Kaczanowski-A Wujków,Z Skibicki-* | 12 | WE | 3![]() | S | 2 | -1 | +100 | 19.12% | 54.61% | |||
| 6 | S Czech-P Zubiel,S Gołębiowski-* | 16 | WE | 7![]() | E | 10 | = | +2220 | 80.88% | 56.26% | ||
| S Czech-S Gołębiowski,*-P Zubiel | 17 | WE | 5![]() | N | A | = | -450 | 77.94% | 57.53% | |||
| S Czech-*,P Zubiel-S Gołębiowski | 18 | NS | 3![]() | S | 2 | +3 | +690 | 95.41% | 59.64% | |||
| 7 | M Nowosadzki-A Tompolska,K Zając-* | 28 | WE | 3![]() | W | K | +1 | +430 | 47.06% | 58.97% | ||
| M Nowosadzki-K Zając,*-A Tompolska | 29 | WE | 6![]() | N | 5 | = | -1440 | 11.76% | 56.61% | |||
| M Nowosadzki-*,A Tompolska-K Zając | 30 | NS | 3![]() | W | 4 | = | -140 | 88.24% | 58.12% | |||
| 8 | Ł Wilamowski-J Łosiak,Z Mikołajczyk-* | 25 | WE | 3 × | E | 5 | -1 | -200 | 42.65% | 57.42% | ||
| Ł Wilamowski-Z Mikołajczyk,*-J Łosiak | 26 | WE | 3![]() | N | 7 | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 58.18% | |||
| Ł Wilamowski-*,J Łosiak-Z Mikołajczyk | 27 | NS | 3![]() | E | 8 | -3 | +150 | 89.35% | 59.48% | |||
| 9 | K Beyer-L Chlebowski,Z Łukaszuk-* | 22 | WE | 2![]() | W | J | +1 | +140 | 64.71% | 59.69% | ||
| K Beyer-Z Łukaszuk,*-L Chlebowski | 23 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | +1 | +650 | 94.12% | 61.01% | |||
| K Beyer-*,L Chlebowski-Z Łukaszuk | 24 | NS | 3![]() | E | 8 | +1 | -430 | 19.12% | 59.46% | |||
| 10 | E Bednarczyk-P Tuszyński,M Armatyński-* | 19 | WE | 4![]() | E | 3 | +2 | +690 | 57.35% | 59.39% | ||
| E Bednarczyk-M Armatyński,*-P Tuszyński | 20 | WE | 4 × | N | 10 | -3 | +800 | 92.65% | 60.53% | |||
| E Bednarczyk-*,P Tuszyński-M Armatyński | 21 | NS | 3![]() | N | Q | = | +600 | 25.09% | 59.35% | |||
| SUMA: | 59.35% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 59.35% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 4 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2010-07-22 o 14:29:52