| ROUND 2, TABLE 35 | ||||||||||||||
| 46. DIAMONDS | VS | 44. EGY SOR, NEM SOR | ||||||||||||
| OPEN | CLOSED | |||||||||||||
| NS: | NS: | |||||||||||||
| EW: | EW: | |||||||||||||
| contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | brd# | contr. | by | lead | tr. | score | imps | TD | ||
| NS EW | NS EW | NS | EW | NS | EW | |||||||||
4![]() | W | 10 | +1 | -450 | 33 | 5 × | S | K | -1 | -100 | 8 | |||
1![]() | S | 8 | +1 | 120 | 34 | 3![]() | N | 3 | = | 600 | 10 | |||
3![]() | E | K | = | -600 | 35 | 3![]() | N | 8 | -2 | -100 | 11 | |||
4![]() | W | 8 | -1 | 100 | 36 | 4![]() | W | J | -2 | 200 | 3 | |||
2![]() | N | 4 | +1 | 140 | 37 | 2![]() | N | 6 | -1 | -100 | 6 | |||
2![]() | S | 9 | +3 | 210 | 38 | 3![]() | S | 3 | +1 | 430 | 6 | |||
3![]() | E | 8 | +2 | -660 | 39 | 3![]() | E | 3 | +2 | -660 | – | – | ||
4![]() | W | Q | +1 | -450 | 40 | 5 × | W | Q | = | -550 | 3 | |||
| IMP: | 9 | 38 | ||||||||||||
| RESULT: | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Board analysis by DeepFinesse, ©William Bailey'1999 | ||||||||||||||